BIRTH OF A NATION

I have always suspected that we were missing something big with regard to Obama’s birth controversy.  After looking at what actual evidence is available, it seem pretty obvious that Obama was born in Hawaii.  I mean his parents do not appear to have ever lived together as husband and wife anywhere, including Hawaii.  It just wouldn’t make sense for Barack Obama, Sr. to drag his new wife wife over to Kenya where he already had a wife.

But, on the other hand, there has been a clear and sustained coverup of Obama’s birth certificate.  Obama is either an arrogant egotist who feels he should not be required to produce the most fundamental of documents, or he is hiding something significant. 

Up until now, the birther’s have all assumed that Obama was hiding the fact that he was born in Kenya and is not a U.S. citizen.  I have never really bought into that, because his mother was definitely a U.S. citizen and I think he would have ultimately been ruled a natural born citizen regardless of where he was born.  The following blog is the first plausible explanation for this bizarre set of circumstances.  Someone has finally come up with a theory that at least makes sense:

http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/05/18/is-regents-of-the-university-of-california-v-bakke-a-1978-case-rejecting-academic-racial-quotas-the-smoking-gun-behind-obamas-kenyan-identity/

Perhaps Obama didn’t want to provide proof that he was born in Hawaii because in doing so he would have been providing proof that he committed a felony.  Based on his own book, Obama was a lousy student at Punahuo High School, majoring in basketall, beer, weed and blow, when he could afford it.  Those of us around at that time remember affirmative action which “required” universities to admit a certain percentage of minority students, regardless of qualifications.  In effect, Obama probably figured out that applying while black was the ticket to a free education.  But the Bakke case changed everything.  The Supreme Court ruled that these affirmative action programs based totally on race were unconstitutional.  Suddenly, being black wasn’t enough.  Obama needed more.

Wait.  What if he was born in Kenya?  Then he could apply as a foreign student and there was the ticket to ride.  It wasn’t that much of a lie, his father was from Kenya.  Elizabeth Warren is a modern reminder of why people do things like this, she just may have got into Harvard by falsely claiming to be part Cherokee Indian.  Perhaps Obama was her inspiration in more ways than we realized.

For the first time, a story that makes sense.  Obama is thinking of running for President and he knows that the place of his birth will be an issue.  He knows this because Obama is the one who started the rumor of his birth in Kenya.  That is pretty obvious, because his literary agent put this in a brochure in 1991, long before Obama ran for any office.

 http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/17/The-Vetting-Barack-Obama-Literary-Agent-1991-Born-in-Kenya-Raised-Indonesia-Hawaii

I doubt that the literary agent enlisted private investigators to try and track down where Obama was born.  He almost certainly asked Obama where he was born and Obama told him Kenya. 

Obama knows he has a problem.  He doesn’t want to prove he was born in Hawaii, because that would prove that, at a minimum, he is a liar and possibly a felon.  But he also doesn’t want to say he was born in Kenya, because that would generate serious questions about his citizenship.  So Obama does what people like him always do.  He tried to balance carefully on a point in the middle of two irreconcilable choices.

The mainstream media either overlooked this brochure or they overlooked the significance of it.  The obvious questions for Obama is why were you allowing people to publish a false narrative of your birth.  Obama may deny being the source of this information, but he would have to be a complete idiot to not notice.  Would any of us allow someone to publish a biography of ourselves, for decades, without bothering to point out this type of error?

This means Obama knew exactly why there were rumors of a birth in Kenya; he started them.  He also know that this was a huge problem.  This would explain the cover-up of the birth certificate.  It would explain the refusal to release his records from Occidental, Columbia and Harvard.  Perhaps when Harvard “selected” Obama to be the first African American President of the Harvard Law Review he was the first “African – American” because they thought he was born in Kenya.  Perhaps it is just me, but it sure looks like a lot of things come into focus.  I wonder if anyone in the main stream media will notice.

TDM

 

2 thoughts on “BIRTH OF A NATION

  1. The tea bagger are the real ones who hate both what the TRUE idea of America is; a mutalcuiturll melting pot ( Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free. Engraved on Statue of Liberty ) except for Mexicans or any people of color .. and of course the real preachings of Jesus Christ, because Jesus preached socialism according to how the stupid tea baggers define it.Instead they mouth the same tired hate filled rhetoric Tim McVeigh used when he attacked America killing 168 people.If you talk like Tim McVeigh did . you might be a tea bagger.If you hate the government, like McVeigh did you might be a tea bagger.If you lie and claim the government under democratic leadership is coming to steal your guns like McVeigh did you might be a tea bagger.If you advocate violence against the US government like Tim McVeigh did you might be a tea bagger.Why are the tea baggers so ideologically like Tim McVeigh?Why do they still carry his water?Sucks to be so wrong all the time don’t it tea baggers

    • I happen to know several “tea party” folks and none of them resemble what you describe. Of course your bias is demonstrated by your use of tea bagger as an obvious insult. That, in and of itself, is hate speech. Most tea party people are for three things. Constitutionally limited government, fiscal restraint and free trade. Which of these offend you. Some, but not all of them are second amendment folks, but I have never heard anything resembling the hate speech you describe. I should point out that your comment itself is filled with hate speech. I wonder if you noticed that.

      I absolutely have never heard a single tea party person put someone down because of the color of their skin. At every event I have attended such activity would be quickly stopped. They make it a policy to conduct themselves in a civil manner. I grant you that they greatly dislike President Obama and would like to see him defeated, but I have never heard them discuss hatred for him. It may happen at other tea party events, certainly not at any I have observed.

      By the way, Jesus did not teach socialism. Read the parable of the ten talents. The Master in the parable took away the talents from the lazy people who refused to work and gave them to the one who produced results. That is close to socialism than capitalism.

      TDM

Comments are closed.