The following article alleges that the shooter in Arizona attended an independent study school with significant connections to a curriculum developed by:   WILLIAM AYERS.  The program was funded by  BARACK OBAMA.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=249429

If this is true, it would help explain why this person liked books like Mein Kampf and the Communist Manifesto.  That is probably from his reading list in high school.  It would explain the anti-government attitude and might help understand his acceptance of violence as a solution to a government he despised.  William Ayers obviously believed in violence against the government.  So did the man he recruited, Mike Klonsky, who was a fellow member of the weatherman underground.  Why would it be a surprise to have anyone connected with them to develop a similar attitude?  .

Democrats and liberals in general were so quick to blame this on the “radical” right that they may have never considered the very real probability that he was actually a product of the liberal left.  If they had not been so eager to attack, before having any facts, they would have quickly learned that this guy was a radical atheist liberal.  If this story gets legs this is going to be hugely embarrassing for Democrats and particularly for Obama.  At least Obama himself did not take any personal shots at Sarah Palin or anyone else with regard to this tragedy.  If he had joined the main stream media chorus he would be in serious trouble.

I think this story is going to get a lot of play.  Liberals brought this on themselves.  If they had just left this alone as a delusional loner, with no political implication, which he was, this story would be long over.  But, by trying to pin this on Sarah Palin and more recently, Rush Limbaugh, this story is going to go on and on.  Republicans are furious that the liberal left immediately politicized this tragedy.  Democrats have already demanded that Darrell Issa investigate toxic political discourse:

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2011/01/11/group-calls-on-issa-to-investigate-toxic-political-discourse/

Sounds like a plan to me.

Such an investigation is going to reveal that the hard right wants less government, more adherence to the constitution, freedom of religion and free speech.  The liberal left just wants to hate people who disagree with them.  One of the real problems for the liberal left is that the internet has changed everything.  A few years ago the main stream media might have gotten away with covering this up and lying about it.  But now the blogosphere is on it and there turns out to be a lot of hard evidence.  The following article by Michelle Malkin is stunning and enlightening.

http://michellemalkin.com/2011/01/10/the-progressive-climate-of-hate-an-illustrated-primer-2000-2010/

Do not read this article if you do not have a very strong stomach. 

Ultimately, the tragedy in Arizona may just result in a backlash against the liberal left that may expose them once and for all.  It’s about time.

TDM

Democrats are furious that the Tucson Arizona killer inconveniently turned out to be a left wing pothead.  Of course the main stream media will never admit that he was a leftist, they now consider him to be from no apparent ideology, left or right.  That is probably correct, but they were sure willing to consider him connected with the right wing, without any evidence at all.  They only developed the “bi-partisan nut case” scenario when it became quite obvious that he was much more closely associated with liberals than with conservatives. 

The following post was put on the Daily Kos, two days before the shooting.  Note, this is from someone in Tucson, Arizona. 

Now ask yourself one simple question:  “Which represents more hate speech, complaining about a congresswoman voting for Obamacare, in spite of wide spread voter opposition, or considering her DEAD because she didn’t vote for Nancy Pelosi?”

It is shameful that so many people, all on the left, are trying to exploit this tragedy.  Have they no shame?  The best way to provide perspective on this case would be consider what would have happened if say, Scott Brown had been shot by someone upset because he voted against Obamacare.  The main stream media would have been outraged if someone dared to imply that Democratic complaints about obstructing health care for all  was somehow responsible.  They would have been quick to point out that this was a deranged individual who was responsible for his or her own actions.

Once again Republicans have let themselves be put on the defensive by the irresponsible and irrational tactics of the liberal left.  What we need is a Republican to show outrage that this tragedy is being exploited for political purposes.   We need a Republican to say that the exploitation of this incident is exactly the kind of hate speech that both parties need to stop.  We need to do what Democrats always do, point out the numerous instances of hate speech from the liberal left and challenge them on their own record.  The real danger here is not from spirited political discourse.  The real danger is if liberals are able to silence political opposition by the shameless exploitation of this incredible tragedy.

In case you are interested the Tea Party Express has already responded to this situation.  This is spot on.  Perhaps that is why they were so effective in the mid-term election:

This weekend we all were horrified to hear the news of the violent shooting of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and several others in Arizona.

One thing that surprised us was how many in the news media and liberal political figures and organizations immediately launched into an attack on the tea party movement – assigning blame for the shooting to our grass roots, Constitutionalist movement in general, and Gov. Sarah Palin in particular.

Friends, this is outrageous.  

It is quite clear that liberals are trying to exploit this shooting for their own political benefit, and they used deception and dishonesty to try and smear all of us and our beliefs.

You know what the truth is?  The truth is that the shooter, Jared Loughner is the one responsible for this atrocity.  But liberals are trying to place the blame on society for embracing the tea party movement.

We here at the Tea Party Express find that disgusting and revolting.

This isn’t a new concept for liberals.  Let us harken back to the words of Ronald Reagan when he called out the Left for similar behavior in years past: 

“We must reject the idea that every time a law’s broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions.”

– Ronald Reagan

If Jared Loughner does have a definable political ideology it is that of a far Left anarchist.  Loughner is a mentally disturbed young man who sought his ideological fulfillment from the Communist Manifesto – hardly the Bible of the Tea Party movement. He posted videos of flag burning on his YouTube channel – again, antics more consistent with Blame America First liberals, not the tea party movement.

In fact, Loughner’s interactions with Congresswoman Giffords date all the way back to 2007 when he confronted her with a question he had, and received an answer he found unacceptable.  You read that right – Loughner’s interactions with Congresswoman Giffords date back to 2007 – well before the tea party movement had even been launched.

This was all an effort to try and demean us and diminish support for the tea party movement, since the Left could not beat us at the ballot box.  Sadly way too many people in the media cooperated with this smear campaign.

The media didn’t tell you that the left-wing website, DailyKos, had targeted Congresswoman Giffords, putting a BULLSEYE on her, did they?  But that’s just what happened.

Instead they tried to blame Gov. Sarah Palin.  Friends, their hypocrisy and double standards are appalling.

This kind of media bias is a large part of why our tea party movement exists – because the voices of We The People have not been represented fairly by the news media, and listened to by our elected officials.

Well guess what:  to those liberals in the news media and on the political Left who think you can silence us, you are wrong!  Your efforts to try and smear us and shut us up will fail.

Right on!.  I hope the Republican leadership is listening.

TDM

The shooting of Congresswoman Gabrielle Gifford is a tragedy.  But the bigger tragedy is the predictable irresponsible reaction by the main stream media.  There is the traditional effort to use any high profile shooting to justify more gun control.  In addition there is already a wide spread movement in the main stream media to try and pin this on Sarah Palin.  Once again we are very likely to have the conversation dominated by those most likely to learn the wrong lessons.

We already know the following about this person.  He was a nut job whose writings were incoherent.  He was a loner.  His favorite book was Mein Kampf and he admired Karl Marx.  He had prior run-ins with the law.  His big concern seemed to be with regard to our currency and our grammar.  One person who knew him, described him as a liberal.  Yet the main stream media immediately tried to tie this to excessive rhetoric by the tea party and anyone else who expresses opposition to the usurpation of power by the Democratic Party and the Obama Administration.  There is no evidence he ever attended a tea party event and he does not appear to have any contact with the tea party.  His two big issues appear to be the gold standard and grammar, neither of which is even discussed by the tea party. 

The main stream media ignores genuine hate speech by the liberal left.  It also quickly buried the obvious fact that if this delusional person was influenced by anyone, it was the liberal left.  Perhaps it is just me, but so the vast majority of actual violence has come from the anti-war liberal left and Muslim terrorists.  I am not aware of any violence from people associated with the tea party. 

It was the liberal left who openly rooted for Dick Cheney’s death.  The main stream media saw no problem with anti-war protestors carrying signs hanging Bush in effigy.  They ignored Al Gore’s screaming rage that Bush had disgraced the office after falsely claiming Bush lied about the WMD in Iraq to be a problem.  (Al Gore believed in those WMD when he was with the Clinton Administration.)  They ignored hate speech against the Bush administration because they also hated the Bush administration.

The shooting at Ford Hood was a tragedy.  It was also clearly an act of terrorism by a Muslim extremist.  The main stream media immediately cautioned people to not assume this man was influenced by his Muslim background, just because he was shouting Allahu Ahkbar while shooting everyone.  They show no such restraint in trying to blame this on the tea party movement.

There is no evidence of any increase in violence because of the tea party.  But that does not slow down the rush to judgment by the mainstream media.  The liberal left believes that this country has become an angrier place over the last two years because of irresponsible verbal assaults by people opposed to the Obama administration.  That is utter nonsense. First, those people who oppose the Obama administration are remarkable for the lack of violence.  This is a political movement.  Second, they assume that people are upset because they have been “tricked” by unethical talk show hosts and political opportunists.   This is typical liberal left delusional thinking.  They believe that every educated person agrees with their world view and they automatically assume that anyone who disagrees is either stupid or misinformed.  The simple truth is that conservative talk radio feeds on the discontent, it does not create it.  The real source of the anger is an administration who tried to jam its liberal socialist agenda down the throats of an unwilling populist.  If you want to know why people are so angry, just ask them.    

Sarah Palin is already at risk because of irresponsible assaults by the liberal left.  Even her children are fair game.  Irresponsibly trying to blame this on her, when she had absolutely nothing to do with this situation, puts her and her family in extreme danger.   If anyone needs personal protection as a result of this unfortunately event it is Sarah Palin and her family.  Gerald Rivera, on Fox News, could not resist taking a shot at Sarah Palin.  He started by admitting that this guy had no connection with her or the tea party and seems to be just a nut case.  Then he opined that this would hurt her politically because of her hateful rhetoric.  Obviously, Gerald must have slept through the period from 2000 to 2008 since he seems to have missed the genuine hate speech from the liberal left with regard to the Bush administration.

I have never heard Sarah Palin suggest violence against anyone and in fact she always abhors violence from any source.  On the other hand, some of her opponents have literally suggested someone should assault and rape her.  It is beyond disgusting.

The only thing certain at this point is that the liberal left will exploit this tragedy and use it to try to pass gun control and to silence political opponents.  There are people who are promoting hate speech and inciting violence. Those people must be stopped.   If the main stream media wants to find those people, they should purchase a mirror. 

TDM

It is clear that Sarah Palin is seriously considering running for President of the United States.  There are a lot of people who hate Sarah Palin and many so-called “experts” doubt she could get elected.  Depending on the poll, and the poll questions, her negative rates sometimes approach 50%.  There are very powerful movements, within both political parties, trying to destroy her candidacy before it begins.  The main stream media is trying desperately to paint her as unqualified to be President.  Republicans are equally concerned and just about every day one of the talking heads opines that she is unqualified to be President.

I do not know if Sarah Palin will run for President.  In some ways, I hope she doesn’t, primarily because Sarah Palin would probably pay a higher price for this than any other Presidential candidate in history.  She has already been subjected to the vilest personal attacks and these attacks have included direct personal assaults on her children.  The only thing certain is that the attacks will continue, they will become more vicious and the main stream media will become even more irresponsible.  I am not concerned over Sarah Palin’s ability to withstand this assault; she has already demonstrated that she is more than up to the task.  I just think it is unfair to expect anyone to endure this kind of treatment.

But it would be a huge mistake to assume she will not run and it would be an even bigger mistake to assume she cannot win.  We have already had a case study of what is likely to happen in the event she chooses to run.  The case study was Bristol Palin’s performance on Dancing with the Stars.  When the show began, most “experts” were predicting that Bristol would be the first person cut.  That did not happen.  She wasn’t brilliant, but she also wasn’t terrible.  The liberal media tried to portray her as some self-centered diva, but that didn’t work.  It soon became obvious that Bristol Palin is just very real and very normal.  She didn’t try to pretend to be anything other than herself, she kept her mouth shut and did the best she could.  A lot of people found that refreshing, particularly when compared to her opponents who were all professional entertainers. 

Suddenly, people realized that Bristol Palin had a chance to win the entire competition.  At that point the liberal blogosphere came unglued.  One guy even shot his TV in disgust.  They invented some bizarre tea party conspiracy and became convinced there had to be major voter fraud in action.  The liberal left cannot comprehend that a lot of people really like people they despise.  They hate Sarah Palin.  They hate anyone associated with Sarah Palin.  They cannot comprehend the concept that people would judge Bristol Palin based on what they saw with their own eyes.  A lot of people, including a lot of Democrats, decided they liked Bristol Palin.  She ended up making it to the finals and came in third.

What happened with regard to Dancing with the Stars really matters with regard to a Sarah Palin run for President.  The only thing certain is that there are going to be a lot of Republican candidates for President.  Sarah Palin’s base support is rock solid and it is a significant percentage.  As long as there are several other candidates, she is always going to be one of the top vote getters. She may not win, but she definitely won’t lose.   Her supporters are her supporters and everyone else will split the remaining vote.  This is exactly how Bristol Palin survived the early stages of Dancing with the Stars, when she frankly did not perform very well.  Her core support was solid and the rest of the vote was split.  Later, when she performed remarkably well, she gained additional support.

As of now, the following people have been “mentioned” as possible candidates for the Republican nomination for President.   I will put them in Alphabetical order:

Haley Barbour                                                           Governor of Mississippi

Mike Bloomberg                                                       Mayor of New York

John Bolton                                                               Former Ambassador to the UN

Scott Brown                                                              Massachusetts Senator

Jeb Bush                                                                    Former Governor of Florida

Chris Christie                                                            Governor of New Jersey

Charlie Crist                                                              Former Governor of Florida

Mitch Daniels                                                            Former Governor of Indiana

Jim DeMint                                                               South Carolina Senator

Newt Gingrich                                                          Former Speaker of the House

Lindsey Graham                                                      South Carolina Senator

Mike Huckabee                                                        Former Governor of Arkansas

Bobby Jindal                                                             Governor of Louisiana

Gary Johnson                                                           Former Governor of New Mexico

Fred Karger                                                              Gay Rights Activitst

Bob McDonnell                                                         Governor of Virginia

Sarah Palin                                                                Former Governor of Alaska

Ron Paul                                                                    Texas Representative

Tim Pawlenty                                                           Former Governor of Minnesota

Mike Pence                                                               Indiana Representative

David Petraeus                                                         General

Mitt Romney                                                             Former Governor of Massachusetts

Wayne Root                                                               Libertarian Candidate

Marco Rubio                                                              Florida Senator

Rick Santorum                                                          Former Senator from Pennsylvania

John Thune                                                               South Dakota Senator

Donald Trump                                                          Businessman 

This is not even the entire list.  This list will be quickly winnowed down to size.  The initial cuts will be made primarily on who is unable to raise sufficient cash.  If you can’t quickly raise millions of dollars for your campaign, you have no chance of staying in the contest.  Following are the people who “won’t” have that problem. 

Mike Bloomberg

Mike Huckabee

Sarah Palin

Ron Paul

Mitt Romney

Donald Trump

Here are the people who may have trouble raising funds, but do have good name recognition and that could change:

Haley Barbour

Scott Brown

Jeb Bush

Newt Gingrich

Lindsey Graham

Bobby Jindal

Tim Pawlenty

David Petraeus

Marco Rubio

Rick Santorum

Note:  I didn’t put Chris Christie on this list because I don’t think he will run.  If he does run, he could run the table. 

Unless something unusual happens, the rest of the list is unlikely to raise enough money to compete for very long.  Obviously the potential field is way too crowded and will need to be cut down quickly.  The first step in the process will probably be some straw polls.  I do not know who will win those polls, but Sarah Palin will always be in the hunt.  She may not win any of these straw polls, but she will survive.  Ultimately this will probably get down to about four or five candidates.  Sarah Palin, Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee will probably be in the mix.  There is also likely to be another, more conservative candidate and possibly another, more moderate (think liberal) candidate. 

But here is the reason why Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee have to be very afraid.  The only way someone is going to take that nomination away from Sarah Palin, if she decides to run, is if she ends up in a one on one contest where those people opposed to her unite behind one candidate.  In a three way contest she will pull about 40% minimum.  History has shown us that neither Mitt Romney nor Mike Huckabee is likely to give up his dream of being President until it is too late.  In effect, Palin could pull a McCain.  McCain never had a majority of Republicans supporting him; in fact there were probably a consistent majority who opposed him.  But, since this was a three way race, with conservatives split between Romney and Huckabee, he ended up with the nomination.

So, while I am not predicting Sarah Palin will win the Republican nomination, particularly this early in the race, she has at least as good a chance as anyone else.  Then the question becomes whether or not she can win the Presidency.

I like Sarah Palin, but I would not consider her to be my first choice to be the next President of the United States.  I would prefer a candidate with more executive experience.  Even if one believes that Barack Obama represents their values, he clearly is naïve and incompetent.  We are paying a terrible price for that incompetence.  Next time we should be careful to elect someone with the leadership and experience necessary to do the job.  In addition, Sarah Palin may be more valuable working on the outside.  But, compared to most of the other candidates, and certainly compared to Barack Obama, Sarah Palin is definitely qualified. 

It is extremely easy and unwise to underestimate her.  What is most remarkable is that unlike all of the other candidates, she does not have a huge staff.  For example when she appears on Fox News she does this in her own studio in front of a television camera operated by her husband Todd.  There doesn’t even appear to be anyone else in the room.  Yet she answers question, even on complicated topics, quickly without hesitation.  I do not know of another politician who is equally capable of doing that.  She is a very rare commodity in national politics, she is her own person.  Sarah Palin says what she means and she means what she says.  She does not need a professional staff to help her determine the best position to take with regard to important issues.  She recently said that if she does run for President, she will not rely on a professional campaign staff.  Perhaps that is because she cannot find anyone more capable of understanding the key issues. 

The best way to tell which player is great is to watch how the other team responds to them.  For example Barry Bonds was possibly the best offensive baseball player in history.  He was so feared that on more than one occasion the other team walked him with the bases loaded rather than let him hit.  They would rather give up one run than four.  The same is true in all sports.  Watch which player receives the most attention from the other team and there is the real super star.

Democrats are not bothering to attack obvious front runners like Mitt Romney or Mike Huckabee, but they are attacking Sarah Palin.  That tells you everything you need to know.  They know who they need to fear.  As long as the main stream media and the Democratic Party continue to attack Sarah Palin, you can bet your bottom dollar that THEY think she is a real threat.  If they ever stop talking about her then and only then should she be concerned.    

 TDM

The size of the person is directly proportional to the size of the person or thing that upsets them!

George Bush was on Hannity promoting his new book, Decision Points.  Bush did not need a Teleprompter to tell us what he thought.  This is a very capable man, far removed from the incompetent boob portrayed in the main stream media.  But what was really stunning was the interaction between George Bush and his former staff.  The George Bush that they described in private was the same George Bush we saw in public.  It was easy to see why these people admired him and respected him.  Dana Perino said it best. She said it was an honor to be the spokesperson for a President who made decisions based on his values.  She said she did not need to worry about what the New York Times said the next day because he did not make his decisions based on his personal popularity.  She said he was a man of integrity who made decisions for the right reasons.

There were numerous times when Bush showed a graciousness and humility that was clearly genuine.  He talked about meeting an Army Sergeant who had lost both legs in Iraq.  Bush visited this soldier in the hospital and in an attempt to encourage him invited him to run with President Bush sometime.  Bush said he was shocked when he got a message that this soldier had received state of the art artificial limbs and was ready to take Bush up on his offer.  There were pictures of Bush and this man running on the South Lawn of the White House.  It was clear that Bush was deeply moved and he was humbled by the experience.  But the most remarkable comment was by the soldier who said that President Bush was a humble man.  He meant it.  Bush was President of the United States, but he treated that soldier as an equal and was genuinely inspired by him.  In Bush we had a President who took the job, not himself, seriously.  No one, watching that show, could possibly doubt the sincerity or the depth of compassion demonstrated by George Bush.  He said that the reason he was so proud to be Commander in Chief was that he was able to come in contact with so many of the outstanding people who serve in our military. 

This image of Bush was far removed from the way he was presented in the main stream media.  This caused me to wonder why Democrats and their supporting liberal main stream media went so far out of their way to destroy this man.  It clearly wasn’t just because Bush is a Republican or even a conservative.  It wasn’t because of the war in Iraq.  It also wasn’t because of an abrasive personality.  Even his enemies acknowledge that George Bush is friendly and warm if you meet him in person.  I finally realized that they hate him for the same reason they hate Sarah Palin.  Bush represented something that the liberal left cannot tolerate.  He is a moral man.  He does not pretend to be perfect, but he is a man who tries to make decisions based on moral values.  Bush sees the world in terms of right and wrong.  He does not subscribe to the principle of moral equivalence.  Liberals see the world in shades of gray and they are deeply intolerant of people who see things in terms of right or wrong.

I believe that some of this is also carry-over from Bill Clinton.  When the Monica Lewinsky story broke, a majority of Democrats in the Senate said that if Bill Clinton had lied under oath that they would vote for impeachment.  However, at some point they decided that it was better for them politically to vote against impeachment.  They justified this on the basis that when Clinton lied it was just about sex and “everybody does it.”  In order for them to justify excusing what Clinton did, they had to convince themselves that all other politicians are the same.   They had to convince themselves that all politicians are corrupt and immoral. 

Then Bush poured salt on the wound by promising to restore dignity and honor to the Presidency.  Liberals were outraged.  If there was a need to restore dignity and honor to the White House, then how could they justify their support of Bill Clinton?   Democrats had to either destroy Bush, or to endure a brutal self-assessment of their own moral character. 

Suppose there is a group of students who decide to cheat on a test.  But one student refuses to go along because he thinks that would be morally wrong.  The cheaters could tolerate him saying he didn’t want to participate because he didn’t want to risk getting caught.  But they cannot tolerate him saying he won’t do it because it is wrong.   They become angry and accuse him of being self-righteous.  This is because when one is wrong and one knows he or she is wrong, it is very disturbing to be confronted with a moral person.  At that point one has to either confront his or her own lack or character or convince themselves’ that it’s ok because the other person is equally flawed.

The liberal left and the mainstream media had to destroy Bush.  They had to convince themselves that he was equally corrupt.  This is why they accused him of doing special favors for big oil in exchange for some vague personal financial gain, although there is no evidence of that.  That is why they felt he had to be abusing the terrorist surveillance program for political purposes although there is not one single example of that.  That is why they had to believe that he had some ulterior motive for ordering the invasion of Iraq even though there is no evidence of that either.   It is why they had to accuse him of lying about the intelligence prior to the war when they knew he was telling the truth.  It was not enough for them to disagree with him on issues, they had to hate him.  They had to attack him the most vicious personal way possible.   Bush then infuriated them even more by failing to respond in kind to the politics of personal destruction.   He could have at least had the decency to lose his temper and launch some personal attacks of his own.  But Bush never did that.  I cannot find a single example of Bush launching a personal attack on anyone.  He frequently disagreed with people on policy issues but he never made it personal.   That made the liberal left even angrier:

Proverbs 25:21-22

If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink:  For thou shalt heap coals of fire upon his head, and the LORD shall reward thee.

I strongly believe that one of the reasons the liberal left hated George Bush was that deep down they knew he was a kind and generous man.  When he refused to lower himself to their level, he heaped coals of fire on their head with kindness.

They are doing the same thing with Sarah Palin.   Liberals fear Sarah Palin for several reasons.  As a result of that fear, they must hate her.  They fear her because she is a skilled politician with an incredible ability to connect.  They also fear her because she sneers at their value system.   One of the big problems we have today is with RINOs who abandon their principles in their desperate search for approval by the cultured elite.  Sarah Palin does not make that mistake.  She literally told the liberal press that she neither sought nor wanted their approval.  Liberals and the cultured elite are not upset because Sarah Palin is not one of them, but rather because she does not care what they think. 

I do not hate Barack Obama.  I think he is a lousy President.  I also think he has dangerously radical values.  I think he is doing great damage to the country, but I do not hate him.  I wish him and his family good health and prosperity.  I would just like to see him removed from a position of power which enables him to do great damge to a lot of innocent people.

I strongly believe that the size of the person is directly proportional to the person or thing that upsets them.  Basically, that means don’t sweat the small stuff.  It also means don’t sweat the small people.  I have had to remind myself of that on more than one occasion.  I eventually realized that if I allowed myself to be obsessed with hatred because of what someone did or said, I was just lowering myself to their level.  The only way I could hope to prevail was to not let small people have a big impact on my life.

George Bush and Sarah Palin understand that.  Their liberal opponents who feel compelled to hate them and launch never ending personal attacks don’t.    

TDM

People love a good conspiracy.  Even today new conspiracy theories are still surfacing with regard to the Lincoln assassination.  How many people know that some nut jobs tried to steal Lincoln’s body and hold it for ransom?  They almost succeeded, since his body was stored in the unsecured basement of his monument in Springfield, Illinois.  The only reason the theft was unsuccessful is that the casket weighed too much and these clowns were unprepared for that.  As a result there was public outrage and Lincolns casket is now encased in concrete.  But, before they sealed him in permanently, there was a group of people who opened the casket to make sure his body was still there.  This was beyond bizarre.

There are regular new additions to the Kennedy Assassination story as well.  In both cases the actual circumstances are well documented.  That is particularly true with the Kennedy assassination.  Every qualified forensic expert who has evaluated the Kennedy assassination records acknowledges that Kennedy was struck by two and only two bullets.  They were both fired from very near the location where Oswald set up a sniper nest.  The bullets came from Oswald’s gun.  Yet the theories keep coming, because most people are dissatisfied with the conclusion that a pathetic worm like Oswald could buy a $4 rifle and off the President of the United States.    For years I thought that Castro had engineered the assassination in revenge for Kennedy trying to assassinate him.   Castro had a point.  But, there is simply no evidence of that.    When Oswald defected to Russia, the KGB thought Oswald was a CIA plant, but eventually realized he was just dumb.  For example, Oswald never even had a driver’s license.   Everyplace he went he traveled by bus.  He got the job at the Texas Book Depository before Kennedy made the decision to travel to Texas.  Oswald tried to assassinate General Edwin A. Walker a few days before he shot Kennedy.  Walker was saved by a wooden divider in his window that Obama didn’t notice.  Obviously if Oswald was part of a conspiracy to kill Kennedy, he wouldn’t have shot at General Walker who was not associated with Kennedy.   Oswald was just a nut case looking for someone to kill and Kennedy drove by his window.  The point is that full disclosure of documentation doesn’t seem to have much impact on stopping conspiracy theories.

But, there are exceptions.  Those exceptions are when real documents surface that confirm what was only suspected.  That is what happened with regard to Richard Nixon.  The audio tapes are what did him in.  In Bill Clinton’s case he was done in by the DNA evidence preserved by Monica Lewinsky on the famous dress.

The new Governor of Hawaii, a KoolAid drinking Obama supporter, wants to stop the “birther” movement.  He is promising to end the nonsense and hints that he will release the actual birth documents.  He may think he is helping Obama, but this story was old news and he just reignited it.

The only thing certain is that Obama does not want his actual birth records released.  He has spent a ton of money conducting an elaborate shell game designed to pretend to let people see these documents, but never letting it actually happen.

Obviously I haven’t seen the actual records, so I can only speculate as to what they would reveal.  So far, to the best of my knowledge, there are no known documents from a hospital, doctor or midwife regarding the birth of Obama.   If such documents do not exist, than the only documentation of where Obama was actually born will be in a signed affidavit from his mother, father, or one of his grandparents.  Since all of these individuals are dead, there is no way to verify the accuracy of such a document.   That would mean there was no definitive proof he was born in Hawaii and no definitive proof he wasn’t.   

Note:  Obama’s mother was a college student and his mother was a bank officer.  It is hard to believe he would have been born in Hawaii and never received any kind of treatment at a hospital.  If he was born in Honolulu, someone should have documents regarding either his birth or immediate post natal care.   It is extremely rare for a baby born in a major metropolitan area to not receive immediate care.

Of course there is always the possibility that the documents are there and Obama just didn’t disclose them.  One would wonder why.  There are rumors that his parents never married, but that hardly seems to be a problem worth the effort.  There are even some bizarre rumors that Frank Marshal Davis is his real father, but I find these hard to believe.  I really can’t think of a good reason for Obama to suppress these documents unless he has something major to hide, but if he was actually born in Hawaii, what else would be worth the effort? 

This whole story is bizarre and releasing the actual records will make it more bizarre.  For example the address given in the birth announcements   is in a rather expensive part of Oahu.  It doesn’t appear that either Obama’s mother or his grandparents would be able to afford to rent this house.   The owner of the house was not related to Obama, it was owned by a professor.   There may be a logical answer to this, but it is just another item in a long list of bizarre circumstances.

My prediction is that the birth story will heat up even more because of this new Governor’s attempt to tamp it down permanently.  The irony is that most conservatives have long considered this to be a non issue.  Now even the liberal left is becoming curious.  Chris Matthews is saying why not just release the Obama’s long-form birth certificate?  Sounds good to me.  When even someone as biased and dense as Chris Matthews figures this out, it is beyond obvious.  The more documents released the more questions.   In the end, we won’t know anything for certain other than that we don’t know anything for certain.  But, this story is heating up again and that is not good news for Obama. 

TDM

Sarah Palin got it right.  The Republican Party desperately needs to purge the party of RINO’s.  We need to complete the RINO PLASTY.  We have just experienced the most destructive, arrogant and irresponsible lame duck session of congress in our nation’s history.  This congress has an approval rating of about 13%, the lowest since anyone started counting.  The American people voted last month to remove the current leadership of congress from power.  The House experienced the most massive turnover of seats since 1948.  The only reason the Senate did not switch parties was that an equal number of Republicans and Democrats were running.  Since Democrats had nearly 60% of the seats, they only escaped because so many of them were not up for election. 

Common sense should have told Republicans to simply say no.  They should have limited this congress to passing the extension of the tax cuts and to passing a short term funding resolution.  Every day the Republican leaders should have said:  “the American people have spoken.  They have voted to radically change congress and it is irresponsible for this current congress, who has been voted out of power, to jam through legislation that would never be approved by the “elected” congress.  If all 42 Republicans in the Senate had remained united, they could have made this happen.

Sadly the normal cast of RINO’s could not resist compromising with Democrats.  As a result, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid shoved a mountain of crap down our throats and the Republicans in the Senate failed in their duty to stop it.  It is disgraceful and should be a reminder that we simply cannot afford to keep electing RINO’s, just because they pretend to be Republicans.    The arrogance of these people is shattering.   This year several RINO’s were defeated in Republican primary elections.  Even though some of the replacement candidates lost, we are still better off than if those RINO’s had been elected.  It is simply better to have a liberal Democrat, who you know is a liberal Democrat, than to have a slimy RINO who pretends to represent your values but doesn’t.  The bottom line is that replacing a Democrat with a RINO results in Democrats remaining in power, only with more political cover.

Sadly, the damage has been done and most of it cannot be reversed.  The good news is that when this lame duck session finally, thank God, adjourns, it will be over.  The new congress may not get much accomplished, but they will  stop this kind of nonsense.

Here is why everyone should be optimistic.  Democrats had their day.  Their day is done.  We are still here.  Everything changes on January 5^th.   Here are the reasons to be optimistic about next year and our nations’ future.

1. The Senate campaigns for 2012 start on January 5^th. 

Unlike this year, a lot more Democrats than Republicans are up for re-election. 

Democrats: 

                Diane Feinstein, California

                Tom Caper, Delaware

                Ben Nelson, Florida

                Daniel Akaka, Hawaii

                Ben Cardin, Maryland

                Debbie Stabenow, Michigan

                Amy Klobuchar, Minnesota

                Jon Tester, Montana

                Ben Nelson, Nebraska

                Bob Menendez, New Jersey

                Jeff Bingaman, New Mexico

                Kent Conrad, North Dakota

                Sherrod Brown, Ohio

                Bob Casey, Pennsylvania

                Sheldon Whitehouse, Rhode Island

                Jim Webb, Virginia

                Maria Cantwell, Washington

                Joe Manchin, West Virginia

                Herb Kohl, Wisconsin

                Joe Lieberman, Connecticut

                Bernie Sanders, Vermont.

Republicans

                Jon Kyle, Arizona

                Richard Lugar, Indiana

                Olympia Snowe, Maine

                Scott Brown, Massachusetts

                Roger Wicker, Mississippi

                John Ensign, Nevada

                Bob Corker, Tennessee

                Kay Bailey Hutchison, Texas

                Orin Hatch, Utah

                John Barrasso, Wyoming.

Note:  In addition to having 20 Democratic seats up for re-election, the tea party can also take on some of those RINOs. 

The 2012 Presidential election starts on January 5^th, 2010.

Democrats

                Barack Obama

(Note:  I really cannot come up with a single Democrat that even looks like a viable primary opponent for Barack Obama at this point.  We have a clearly imcompetent President, yet the Democrat Party does not appear to have anyone better available.  This, of course, assumes that Hillary Clinton is serious about not running.  Keep in mind that in order to win a Democratic primary, one has to be more progressive than Obama.)

Republicans

                Sarah Palin

                Mitt Romney

                Mike Huckabee

                David Petraeus

                Newt Gingrich

                Bobby Jindal

                Tim Pawlenty

                Chris Christy

                Rudy Guiliani

                Haley Barbour

                Jeb Bush

                Rick Perry

Note:  This is just the list as of now and I probably left some people out.  There are now 32 Republican governors.  Several of them could easily emerge over the next 12 months to become a serious factor.  Republicans were elected governors in 12 swing states, including Pennsylvania, Ohio and Florida. 

 Republicans’ did get the Bush tax cuts extended, for everyone.  The cut in payroll tax will also help.  The extension of unemployment benefits was going to happen anyway, because no one in either party has the guts to make the tough decision to cut off benefits. 

 It is always darkest just before dawn.  We just ended the darkest of the dark.  Nancy Pelosi is out of power.  Harry Reid is also out of power, because he does not have close to 60 votes in the new Senate and a lot of those Democrats up for election in 2012 are going to start moving rapidly to the right.  Barack Obama is hopelessly incompetent and his only chance for re-election is to start working with Republicans.  Even if he somehow gets re-elected, which does not look likely, he will be a very different President than we had for the last two years.

The really good news about 2012 is that this country saw a battle between the tea party and progressives.  The tea party won.  Progressives just got done pushing through some nasty stuff, but it was the last minute desperate act by a political movement permanently on its way out of power.

Happy New Year.

TDM

We are drawn to those who dream the impossible dream.  One of my favorite personal memories was from the 2004 Boston Red Sox.  The Yankees were up 3 games to 0 and has a 4 to 3 lead going into the ninth inning of game 4.  Mariano Rivera, who just embarrassed the Boston Red Sox hitters, was on the mound.  Most of the Red Sox fans were in despair, waiting for the final stake in the heart.  But then the TV camera picked up one guy in the right field bleachers holding up a sign that said:  “I still believe.”  My wife and I laughed and said that he was probably the only one left who believed.

But, he was right.  The Red Sox came back to win that game and to win the next 7 games in a row ultimately winning the 2004 World Series. 

But sometimes, dreaming the possible dream is nothing more than abject stupidity.   There was one guy who sold his home, took all the money and bought lottery tickets.   He dreamed the impossible dream and experienced the all quite predictable loss as a result.   Democrats in the United Congress have morphed from dreaming the impossible dream to chasing rainbows.  The House under the brilliant leadership of Nancy Pelosi is trying to renegotiate the tax cut deal already approved by both President Obama and the Senate.  There is zero chance of getting this passed, so all they can hope to accomplish is to put an enormous, but temporary tax increase on everyone effective January 1, only to have it quickly reversed when Republicans take over control of the House.  They also try tried to jam through one last ditch major spending bill apparently with the assumption that neither Republicans, nor the American people, would notice.  They have been so busy with nonsense that they still haven’t passed a continuing resolution bill to at least keep the government from shutting down.  Now, after accomplishing absolutely nothing, they are going to make one last ditch effort to repeal “don’t ask, don’t tell.”  This level of stupidity is not inherited, it is earned.  Harry Reid is equally delusional, trying to shove through a huge spending bill with earmarks even the House rejected.  This was after he wasted everyone’s time trying to pass the dream act.  Now he is threatening  to keep congress in session until January 4^th, in a last ditch effort to do more damage before power shifts to the Republicans.  At least Harry does realize that after January 4^th, 2010, the “Party” is over.

The approval rating for this congress is now down to 13%.  When you think about it, that is a major accomplishment.  There are about 40% of the people who automatically vote for any Democratic unless the candidate is so loathsome that even they can’t stand the stench.  To get down to 13% you have to be so obviously bad that even life-long Democrats are fed up.   Such accomplishments are rare, because it requires a rare combination of incredibly bad leaders supported by really stupid followers.   Several people have pointed out that the country can survive a leader as bad as Barack Obama, but questioned whether it can survive being stupid enough to have elected him.  But the fact is that most people who voted for Barack Obama voted for a totally false image of him presented by the main stream media.  I have met many “former” supporters who are shocked to learn the truth about Barack Obama’s background.  They were guiltier of not paying attention and swallowing the main stream media myths than they were of voting for an obviously unqualified candidate.  But the Democrats in the House and the Senate knew or should have known that Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid were leading them over the cliff in a mad dash to suicide.  If they didn’t know it before the election, they certainly know it now.  Perhaps the Democratic Party can survive being stupid enough to elect Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid and Barack Obama as their leaders, but can they survive being stupid enough to continue following them into the political abyss?

TDM

It is impossible to overstate the level of chaos and self destruction in the Democratic Party.  Instead of focusing on what matters, like approving the budget, and extending the Bush tax cuts, they tried to jam through highly controversial legislation, like the Dream Act and repealing “don’t ask, don’t tell.”  Then Obama announced that he had reached an agreement with the Republicans without bothering to get approval from his own party.  At least you have to give Obama credit where credit is due.  He appears to be just as willing to disregard Democrats as he has been willing to ignore Republicans.  Democrats disintegrated into a screaming, incoherent mob literally dropping the F bomb on their own President.

This decision was a good move by Obama, but his incompetence quickly surfaced.  He had to give back to back press conferences to try and sell it, because obviously the first attempt failed.  Then, instead of embracing the deal as a good compromise, he described it as giving in to the hostage taker Republicans.  It is hard to sell a deal when you say it is a terrible deal signed only under duress.  In addition to being an unprecedented public display of weakness by a U.S. President, it was incredibly stupid.  Finally, in an act of desperation, Obama invited Bill Clinton to come in and help him sell the deal.  Obama said he had to go to a Christmas party, so he just walked out and left Clinton to carry on.  Even Clinton was shocked.  It was pathetic.

To make things worse, this deal has already been approved by the Senate, with a huge bi-partisan majority.  That leaves the Democratic House in a total meltdown.  If they pass this bill, they will get no credit and it will be viewed as a major loss.  On the other hand, if they don’t pass this bill, everyone will get a huge tax increase, they will get the blame, and Republicans will pass it in January.  This is the ultimate lose lose.

 While it is always fun to watch Democrats self-destruct, this really isn’t funny at all.  We just had a President of the United States publicly give up.  Every leader in the world knows that and will respond accordingly.  When the going gets tough, Obama gets going, usually to a golf course or a Christmas Party.  (Oops…in the Obama White House there are only “holiday parties.”

The following article by Walter Shapiro, who has been an Obama supporter, is very interesting.  Shapiro is apparently unaware that most experts don’t believe Obama wrote either of his books.  This was confirmed by interviews reported in a very pro-Obama biography.  So while Shapiro still believes these books show Obama’s brilliance, his analysis also shows a very troubled individual based on Obama’s own statements.  One would suspect that even though Obama probably didn’t write the books, these statements accurately represent his world view.  

 http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/12/11/ready-obamas-autobigraphy-revisited-dreams-from-a-beleague/

The result is a curiously detached individual who lucked into the Presidency and while he likes the trappings of the office, does not really want the responsibility.  That is why he allowed Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid to push through their liberal agenda while he vacationed and played golf.  Obama just didn’t care enough to get involved.  He showed a remarkable lack of interest in the details of his cornerstone legislation.  When confronted with the need to make a major decision, Obama routinely punts.  This has been demonstrated many times, with regard to Afghanistan, Iraq and even the BP oil spill.  If you don’t know what to do, you just delay until the decision become obvious.

 Unfortunately failing to make a decision is a decision, usually the worst decision.  Let me give an example.  A young boy has a cancerous tumor.  The doctor approaches the parents and asks for authorization to amputate the leg.  The parents do not want their son to die, but they cannot bring themselves to authorize the amputation.  They decide to wait, to ask for more tests, to get another opinion in a desperate search for some option other than making that horrible decision.  But, the delay results in the cancer growing, and when they finally decide to approve the operation, it is too late and their son dies.  

At least this time Obama made a decision, but at this point he has almost no credibility.  To at least some extent he turned over the Presidency to Bill Clinton, for at least a few moments.  There are a lot of reports that Joe Biden is going to take a more senior role in the administration.  Joe Biden?  Please!  I do not know what will happen, but this is a very serious problem.  While there are constitutional provisions for a President who commits high crimes or misdemeanors and there are provisions if the President is incapacitated and unable to performs the duties of President, what options are available for a President who is simply not up to the job and apparently no longer wants the responsibilities of the job?   A lot of people were justly worried about Obama’s radical agenda.  They should have been more worried about his naivety and inexperience. 

Whenever Obama speaks and attempts to explain things, it get worse.  Perhaps the only solution is imspeechment.  We still let Obama pretend he is President, we just don’t let him speak in public.

 We need a President.  We have Obama.  A significant amount of prayer is appropriate.

TDM

Spinal  meningitis is a very dangerous desease.  Failure to recognize it and treat it can be fatal.  It is now obvious that the country suffers from another even more dangerous condition called having “spineless men who guide us.”

For a long time I have wondered who is the real Obama.  Is he the dangerous left wing radical exposed on the Glenn Beck show?   Or is he merely an incompetent fool with no experience who accidentally got elected President of the United States?   The “brilliant” Obama has pretty much disappeared from sight.  There is still a wide range of opinions with regard to Obama, but neither the left nor the right end of the political spectrum thinks he is up to the job.  The real problem is not that Obama is a left-wind radical, or that he is arrogant or even that he is inexperienced.  The real problem is that he clearly suffers from the lack of a spine.

Normally, a President would gain from making a difficult but necessary decision.  Obama made the right decision to compromise on extending the Bush tax cuts.  If he had come out and said he listened to the people and decided that compromise was in the best interest of the country it would have been his finest hour.  Unfortunately Obama’s two press conferences were so bad that he actually made things worse.  His thin skin was on full public display, when he slammed his liberal base for being daring to say they were disappointed with him.  The equivalent of this would be for a football coach who just lost an important game to blame the loss on his players and insist that he had done his job as a coach but he couldn’t play the game for them.  Then the coach would blame the fans for not giving enough support.   Finally the coach would say that the other team was deliberating doing everything possible to defeat him.

He literally said that negotiating with Republicans was like negotiating with hostage takers and he had to give in to save the hostage.  What an incredibly stupid and dangerous thing to say.  If there was any world leader left who was afraid to confront Obama, all doubt with regard to his weakness has been removed.  Obama has admitted that he cannot tolerate pain, and when presented with a threat, he will fold.

For years the United States has had a firm policy of not negotiating with terrorists.  There is a good reason for that policy.  While giving in to demands may save a hostage but in the long run this just encourages more hostage takers.   

This is a very serious problem.  When it is somewhat entertaining to see Republicans mop the floor with Obama and to watch the liberal left hyperventilate, the problem is that Obama is President of the United States.  We live in dangerous times and we desperately need a leader with a spine to make the difficult decisions.  We are in grave danger when there is no “Spine in the Men Who Guide Us.”

TDM