Several years ago, while working for a major corporation, I had a trial ready to start. This regarded a slip and fall claim. We were prepared to go to trial because our store manager witnessed the entire incident and he was an extremely good witness. However, the night before the trial our “star” witness called me and with a quakely voice said he needed to tell me something. He said that while he didn’t mind lying for the company during the investigation and the deposition he was queasy about lying under oath in court. I said what do you mean? He said that he was lying about everything, it happened just the way the plaintiff said it happened. I was absolutely shocked. I called our attorney and we scrambled to get the case settled.

If he had just told us the truth from the start, we could have handled this claim much faster and for far less money. If he thought he was doing us a favor, he couldn’t have been more wrong.

I thought of this story when considering the proposed testimony of Christine Ford. She may have a very similar dilemma. If she repeats her allegation, under oath, that there were three or four witnesses to the alleged sexual assault by Judge Kavanaugh, she could have serious legal problems. That is because all of these people have denied even knowing about the incident. If they are desposed and they say the same thing under oath, then she could be charged with perjury. On the other hand if she admits they didn’t witness the event, that discredits her entire claim. This is the ultimate lose-lose situation.

In addition, she should give serious consideration to what will happen if Judge Kavanaugh is not confirmed. If he is denied a position on the Supreme Court, because of a patently false allegation, he is likely to be more than angry. He is likely to sue.

The following article shows the potential financial cost of making a false sexual assault claim. Christine Ford allegedly works for a firm that produces abortion pills. If a jury were to find a connection there they could also be at risk.

https://www.westernjournal.com/army-col-assault-allegations-blown/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=patriotupdate&utm_campaign=dailyam&utm_content=libertyalliance

Senator Grassley has reported that the Judiciary committee has already hired a female attorney to conduct the interview.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/25/politics/ford-kavanaugh-hearing-counsel-hired-republicans/index.html

He has called the Democrats bluff and they are shreiking hysterically. The amount of flak Grassley is getting is proof he is over the target. Democrats have put themselves between a rock and a hard place. If Christine Ford does not show, Republicans will just schedule the vote. If she does show, it is likely to be a disaster. If Democrats try to delay this, again, even CNN will figure out that there is a serious problem. The most recent woman to come forth with a claim against Kavanaugh was pillored by the MSM. They just weren’t buying it. I think the MSM has finally become embarrassed.

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kyle-drennen/2018/09/24/even-liberal-media-highly-skeptical-new-yorkers-kavanaugh-hit-piece

Democrats were clearly hoping that the lack of evidence would be overwhelmed by the volume of people willing to make claims. That is backfiring and any new witness that surfaces is likely to face similar scrutiny. Even Avenatti has suddenly shut down his twitter account and his star witness appears to be running for the hills. Probably a good idea.

We do not know where this will end up, but it is pretty easy to see who has momentum and who does not. Unless there is some massive undisclosed bombshell, if Republicans stay the course, Democrats are in big trouble.

TDM

Christine Ford is scheduled to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday. The deal is not done. Her attorney is horrified that she will be questioned by a female attorney trained to investigate sex crimes. They want her to be questioned by Kamala Harris, who will sob with her about the shame of being sexually assaulted and ask questions like: “how difficult is this for you” or “what do you want to say to other women who were sexually assaulted?”  It will be her audition to be the Democratic candidate for President in 2020. They want a Ted Cruz to ask a pointed question, like: “how did you get home from that party.” Any honest question will do.  This will be showcased on all the networks as another insensitive white male who doesn’t get it.

Frankly, they would prefer she not testify at all, because so many people are already willing to believe her, without regard to any facts. Why on earth risk changing that by answering questions. So far, Republicans are not backing down. It would not surprise me if Christine Ford’s attorney demands another delay and refuses to show up for this biased and unfair hearing. They are already writing letters saying exactly that. Has anyone checked to see if she is actually driving from California to Washington, D.C.?

If she does testify, and is questioned by a qualified female attorney, her accusations are very unlikely to withstand scrutiny.  Her attorneys are probably training her non-stop to cry upon demand and avoid answering difficult questions with tears and dismay that people won’t believe her.  Democratic Senators are already practicing disrupting the testimony and demanding adjournment. The least likely thing is to just let her state her case in a rational setting. The challenge is she doesn’t appear to be a professionally trained actress, and this may be difficult to pull off convincingly.  That is particularly true if she is being questioned by a competent female attorney who knows how to deal with this. If Republicans stand firm on having her questioned by the right attorney, they probably win the day. If they allow Democrats to turn this into another circus, they lose.

Her attorneys know this is high risk, which is why odds are against her testifying at all. That will leave it up to a vote. If Susan Collins stays the course and votes to confirm Kavanaugh, it is over.  He will be confirmed. If she votes no, a couple of other Republicans are likely to join her. His confirmation will be in jeopardy. Sadly, this is probably going to come down to one vote by one person. She is under tremendous pressure by the liberal left to vote no. So far, she seems to be holding firm. It was Susan Collins who recommended her being interviewed by a competent female attorney, so refusing to accept that demand may cost liberals the one vote that really matters.

The good news is that the American people are weighing in and although RINO Republicans are famous for snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, they can still count. They believe Rush Limbaugh when he says that if Republicans cave and fail to confirm Kavanaugh they will get hosed in the 2018 mid-term elections. He is right about that. If Republicans win this battle, they win the war. The Blue wave will crash and will be replaced by a Red Tide, if for no other reason than the fact that victory has a thousand fathers, but defeat is an orphan. If liberals lose this one, they will be in big trouble. But if Republican lose, it will be Democrats singing ‘Happy Days Are Here Again.” Somebody is going to win, and somebody is going to lose.

There are few times we realize our greatest hopes or worst fears. This is one of those times.  The clock is running out, for both sides. If Democrats can push this into extended overtime by lying and cheating with the loud support of the MSM they will win. If Republicans stay the course and refuse to play the game, they win. We may know as early as Thursday Night.

TDM

Most people expected President Trump to fire Rod Rosenstein today. I mean, how much worse can it get. Even if Rosenstein was sarcastic when he asked Andrew McCabe if he should wear a wire when talking to the President, that is a big problem. At a minimum Rosenstein should have advised Trump with regard to what was going on.

Everyone, in both parties, is assuming that Rosenstein never reported this to either Trump or Sessions. But what if that is not true? What if he told Trump there were senior people in the FBI plotting to remove him. What if he told Trump the truth, that the entire Russian collusion investigation was a scam based on falsified information.

If Trump had allowed the Russian investigation to be continue to be run by the FBI under the direction of Andrew McCabe, it could have been disastrous. There is already evidence that McCabe wasn’t above falsifying evidence. It would take months to get a replacement Director of the FBI that Trump could trust. If he ordered Sessions to shut down the investigation, Democrats and some RINO Republicans would have gone ballistic.

Perhaps Trump did the unexpected. Perhaps it was his idea to have Rosenstein to appoint a Special Counsel. That would throw Democrats completely off the scent. Rosenstein chose Robert Mueller. The same Robert Mueller that spent a lot of one on one time with the President the day before he was appointed. Coincidence?

What if Rosenstein and Mueller were doing exactly what Trump wanted them to do. How would that look? The investigation would find no evidence of the Trump campaign colluding with Russia because it never happened. But the people conspiring to take down a president would feel safe and empowered. Rosenstein would possibly be the most important undercover operator in the history of American politics. In the meantime the IG would be doing the real investigation. Another topsecret investigation would be conducted by John Huber reporting directly to Jeff Sessions.

All of the people at the FBI and DOJ who were conspiring against Trump have been removed from power. But Rosenstein remains. Is that because Trump is afraid to fire him? Unlikely. It is more likely because Rosenstein is doing exactly what Trump wanted him to do.

The FBI and the DOJ have been withholding documents. Yet, they haven’t been withheld from Republicans in congress and they haven’t been withheld from the President. When the President started the declassification process, he was getting these prepared for public disclosure. Trey Gowdy warned Trump that these wouldn’t change anyone’s mind. Then Rosenstein met with the President and said two things. He said releasing those documents could expose the Special Counsel investigation as potentially illegitimate. Why would that be a problem for Trump? Trump already knew it was an illegitimate investigation. Why would he care? He would care if he still wanted his enemies to ignore the obvious. That investigation was never about Donald Trump. That begs the question: who was the real target of that investigation. It could just possibly be the people doing the investigating.

This is how the FBI caught Soviet Spy Robert Hanssen. He was promoted to a new job, supervising FBI Computer Security. His assistant, Eric O’Neill was an undercover agent.O’Neill found the smoking gun that resulted in Hanssen’s arrest and conviction.

Rosenstein also said it was important to let the IG finish his report. The IG isn’t investigating Trump, he is investigating those opposed to Trump. After meeting with Rosenstein,Trump said he would wait for the IG to finish his job, which he expected to happen soon.

The main stream media wants to believe that Trump will fire Rosenstein. They want to believe that Rosenstein shared their opinion of Trump and that he was their ace in the hole that would save the day. They never considered the possiblity that both Rosenstein and Mueller would put principle ahead of politics. That both would honor the rule of law and the constitution. Think about this. Mueller only indicted people that didn’t matter. He had to indict someboy to justify the investigation. But justify it to who? Certainly not to Trump. Far more likely to the liberal left who desperately wanted to believe that the conspiracy was working and the walls were closing in on Trump. Leak after leak has not harmed Trump but it has exposed and embarrassed a lot of Democrats in congress and their connections in the MSM.

We don’t know. We don’t even know who does know. We only know that Rosenstein wasn’t fired today and Trump doesn’t exactly look to be on a mission to fire him any time soon. Everyone assumes that Trump is intimidated by Democrats and fears a constitutional crisis. But, that doesn’t seem to fit with his personality. This is not exactly a guy who is easily intimidated. He wasn’t intimidated by the sex scandals, he just denied them and dared Democrats to do anything about it. I belief that if Trump thought Rosenstein was a threat, he would already be gone.

Even if Trump fires Rosenstein,it probably won’t be until after Kavanaugh is confirmed. He doesn’t need to give Democrats another reason to try and delay things. The only thing we really know is this: either Rosenstein did a lousy job in trying to remove a President, or he did a great job doing something else.

TDM

Ed Whelan has backed down, somewhat. He probably realized that he was stupid to name someone else as a possible suspect in a sexual assault. The reality is that no one knows if there even was a sexual assault. There is zero chance a legal authority will investigate this, so the person named by Whelan would have a pretty easy defamation of character case.  Even if it was his house and there was a party there is no evidence of a sexual assault and there never will be.

However, he is not backtracking on his analysis and he clearly has people talking to him. Whelan already knows things and there clearly are people out their investigating. That is extremely dangerous for Christine Ford, particularly when her own case is so pathetically weak on details.

Real obvious questions explain the problem.

She was 15.  How did she get to the party? Did she frequently attend parties where there was heavy drinking? Where there any adults present?

At best there were four boys and two girls. Who thought that was a good idea for a 15 year old girl?

How did she get home?

What time did she arrive home?

Did she say anything to her parents?

Did she say anything to her friends?

Did she say anything to anyone?

If she was truly traumatized, she would have told someone. It might not have been the police, it might not have been her parents, it might not have been a teacher, but she would have told someone, She didn’t.  Even if someone surfaces now saying they knew, no one will buy it.

I suspect we won’t hear much more from Whelan, and that’s a shame, but the reason will be that by the time he has this documented, she won’t matter any more.

TDM

I have been responsible for handling thousands of law suits. I quickly learned to look for the blink. The blink is the moment when the plaintiff does or says something that lets you know how they really feel about the case.

It is really quite simple. Plaintiff attorneys usually come in with their flags flying high, they think they have the case of the century, the would really like to try this, but might be willing to settle if the price is high enough. The truth is that it is very rare for any case to go to trial and in most cases the plaintiff attorney is just as anxious to settle the case as the defense. In some cases, more anxious to settle, because to the defense, it is often just a matter of the cost. For the plaintiff, if they try and lose, they get nothing. For the plaintiff, a loss can be a big financial hit.

I learned to watch for that moment when the plaintiff attorney signaled his or her real intent. It was often subtle.  Perhaps a slight change in tone. Perhaps a more muted response to a settlement offer. I learned to look for it and when I saw it I never ignored it. Once I saw the blink, I knew the case was going to settle and we were near the end.

We are close to the end of the Christine Ford fiasco. Although some people think Grassley blinked by extending the deadline, he didn’t.  His position is the same.  You can testify, but only under our rules and you have to set a firm date NOW.  If you don’t do that, we are just going to vote. It was the plaintiff attorney who blinked, when just before the deadline, she asked for more time to decide. This was an admission that she believed Grassley and he wasn’t going to play the delay game anymore. Grassley knows that, and it will inform his decision on how to move forward.

Her stated reason for delay is absurd. She wants to drive across the country instead of flying. No one is buying that. Odds are there are already numerous records of her flying all over the place for personal and business reasons. This was just a joke excuse, clear evidence that there never was an intent of her testifying, at least not in a rational setting.

Oh, they would have loved another Senate hearing circus with Pamela Harris praising her for the courage to tell the truth about this jerk and only asking her how much pain and humiliation she must be feeling. Then some white Republican Senator would say something wrong in his opening statement or will ask a question with the wrong tone. Frankly, it wouldn’t have mattered what actually happened, the MSM was already prepared to slam those old white Republicans for shamming a sexual assault victim. The truth would have been the least likely outcome.

But Grassley quickly shut that down by announcing that she would be questioned by a competent female attorney. That eliminated all the upside for Ford and only left a really big downside. Her attorney had zero intentions of participating in a good faith investigation. The whole point was only to defeat the nomination by delaying it.

At this point, it doesn’t matter what she does. Grassley has her cornered. If she doesn’t testify, Kavanaugh is confirmed. If she does testify, her paper-thin accusation will be exposed, and he will still be confirmed. What she can no longer due is delay the process.

We have seen the blink. The end is near.

TDM

There is now open battle between the New York Times and NBC. The NYT ran an article saying that Rod Rosenstein wanted to wear a wire to gather evidence against Trump. Rosenstein denied the story. But then NBC ran its own story on the same meeting. It turns out that Rosenstein was being sarcastic in a conversation with Andrew McCabe. This makes the NYT look silly.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/rosenstein-joked-about-secretly-recording-trump-say-sources-n911981

“Well, what do you want me to do, Andy, wear a wire?”

Now compare that to the following NYT article:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/21/us/politics/rod-rosenstein-wear-wire-25th-amendment.html

It seems pretty obvious that the NBC version of events makes a lot more sense. That is particularly true when one realizes that both Andrew McCabe and Lisa Page were in that meeting and both are no longer with the FBI.

Ultimately, this may be the most accurate explanation for what was going on at the FBI. I frequency say that we should not assume malice when mere incompetence is a satisfactory explanation. Here we have a lethal combination of malice and incompetence.

The malice was always obvious. Now, thanks to this article from NBC, we know that the incompetence ultimately overwhelmed the malice.

The real problem with James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page and others is not their bias, lots of people have bias. It is their stupidity. These arrogant self-righteous fools really thought they could gin up a plot that would remove Donald Trump as President of the United States. Peter Strzok convinced himself that he was superman who could save the day. Andrew McCabe thought he was the leader of elite professionals who would quickly dispatch the silly naïve clown called Donald Trump.

Now, they are all gone and the Mueller investigation, which started with nothing, is ending with nothing. Trump is still President of the United States and if anything, he is stronger today than when he started. The political landscape all across the globe is littered with the bodies of people who were so much smarter than Trump. At some point one would think liberals would start to notice the obvious, but feelings are a poor substitute for logic and common sense, particularly when one’s vision is distorted by poorly designed rainbow colored lenses.

The reality is that the entire Russian Collusion myth and the special counsel investigation was a joke from the beginning. However, no one is laughing.

TDM

Christine Ford will not show up to testify Monday. We already know that. Republicans will hold the hearing, without her, and then schedule a vote. Brett Kavanaugh will be confirmed. But although this will be a major defeat for liberals and the Democratic leadership, much worse is just around the corner.

Enter Ed Whelan. Whelan graduated from Harvard in 1981. In 1985 he graduated from Harvard Law School, magna cum laude and was on the board of Editors of the Harvard Law Review. He was general counsel to the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary and later was Senior Vice President and Counselor to the General Counsel for Verizon. He was a former law clerk for Justice Scalia. He is currently President of The Ethics and Public Policy Center. This is one serious attorney. While Democrats were hyperventilating, Whelan was investigating. What he has already found is more than enough to clear Brett Kavanaugh:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/former-scalia-law-clerk-drops-pictures-and-evidence-that-blows-christine-fords-case-wide-open/

He has already created reasonable doubt, just by checking out the extremely limited information given by Christine Ford. She told the Washington Post that the assault took place in a house near the Columbia Country Club. It took Whelan about five minutes to figure out that although neither Brett Kavanaugh or his friends live anywhere near this location, another friend named Chris Garrett lived there. He even has the floor plan of the house which sure looks consistent with the place described by Christine Ford.

It gets worse. if you look at the pictures of Garrett and Kavanaugh next to each other they look very similar. Whelan probably already has several classmates willing to describe how much they looked alike. He has already found enough information to create a huge shadow of doubt. My guess is that he will shortly have more than that. All he would need is one of the four people that Christine Ford identified as at that party confirm that yes there was a party, there was a lot of drinking and Brett Kavanaugh wasn’t there. Nothing else would matter, because no one could possibly be investigated for a crime. No serious law enforcement agency would even open a file.

This is so bad that even Ms. Ford may admit that she can’t be totally sure the person she was talking about was Brett Kavanaugh. One thing is certain, she would be insane to testify about this under oath. The potential for walking into a perjury charge would be sky high. Grassley already called her bluff by saying she would be interviewed by a skilled attorney, not the clowns on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

I wouldn’t even be surprised if Ms. Ford admitted that she couldn’t be positive that Brett Kavanaugh was guy involved. She certainly would be insane to say he was, under oath, because that could lead to a perjury charge. Admitting that she might have misidentified him could be her best option. Then she can still claim she was telling the truth about the incident and the MSM will forget she ever existed.

Whelan found all this in a few hours. He claims he has more. If he is right, a lot of those self-righteous liberal Democrats demanding that everyone believe Christine Ford are going to be eating a lot of very public crow. I doubt that any of them are remotely capable of doing the right thing and apologize, but this is too delicious for the MSM to ignore.

This could be a really beautiful thing and what would make it even more enjoyable is that all of these people really have it coming.

TDM

The declassification of documents regarding the Carter Page FISA warrant and other files involving James Comey, Andrew McCabe and a cast of thousands was ordered by President Trump.  Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff and Mark Warner just sent a letter demanding people defy the President and delay release of those documents. The following article includes a copy of that letter.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/09/18/corruption-junction-desperation-amid-democrat-members-of-the-intelligence-gang-of-eight/#more-154239

They are literally claiming that the gang of eight has the authority to direct the DOJ, FBI and our intelligence agencies to withhold information from the President. Actually, not the entire gang of eight, this letter is only signed by Democratic members of the gang of eight. This is more than desperate, it is absurd. If this was THAT important all the members of the gang of eight, not just the Democrats should have signed it.  Now it is nothing more than a highly partisan document signed by desperate people.

It is now impossible for the MSM to ignore these documents when they are released. If they didn’t matter, why bother?  Even in news rooms at NBC and CNN smarter heads are snapping to attention.

In addition, Brett Kavanaugh will be confirmed to the Supreme Court, in spite of the best efforts by Democrats.  The same people who were demanding the public release of any and every document ever within 100 yards of Brett Kavanaugh are now demanding federal agencies withhold critical intelligence from the President of the United States. This is so bad that even liberal justices may join in condemning a move so obviously unconstitutional. I doubt that Supreme Court Justice, Brett Kavanaugh, who just may be the deciding vote, will be very impressed.

They only possible explanation for an act this desperate is that these documents are really, really bad. Remember, the gang of eight has already seen the unredacted documents. They know what is there. They know these documents are nothing less than bombshells. They will prove that Sean Hannity was right all along, and the entire Russian collusion investigation was a hoax. They will prove that the self-righteous hyperventilating by the MSM fueled by leaks from Democrats, was all based on a lie. Even some of those talking heads are likely to be furious at Democrats. A lot of people are about to be embarrassed. The witch hunt is over and attention will be focused entirely on those hunting witches.

The people who run CNN, NBC, ABC and CBS will be forced to take some action to restore credibility. This is the worst failure of American journalism in our nation’s history and it is about to be put on full public display for all to see. The only question is whether these talking heads on the liberal networks were complicit in a hoax or merely incredibly stupid.

This reminds me of a boss who owned a Ford dealership. He told his sales staff that if they drank on the job, they should drink beer and not vodka. He preferred his customers to think of them as drunk rather than stupid.

TDM

If you are in Washington, D.C. you can visit Ford’s Theater, where Abraham Lincoln was assassinated. It is always interesting to see real places where historical events occur. This year we have a chance to see a hysterical event which could also be appropriately labeled: “Ford’s Theater.”

Let us set the stage. Brett Kavanaugh is on his way to be confirmed to the Supreme Court. Democrats have tried every trick in the book to try and delay his confirmation and nothing worked. Then, a last minute accusation by an unidentified female, who we now know to be Christine Blasey Ford, of an alleged attempted sexual assault 35 years ago surfaced. Democrats, conveniently, are using this to, gasp, demand a delay in the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh. It really doesn’t get more obvious than this. No logical person thinks this was pure coincidence.

Sometime, we are not sure when, someplace, we are not sure where, Ms. Ford allegedly was at a party in a private residence with four guys and her, the only girl, where there was a lot of drinking. Her attorney recently hinted that there may have been another female there, but of course did not mention any name. So assume there were, at best, four guys and two girls drinking heavily at a private residence. Anyone want to recommend this for your daughter? At this party apparently Brett Kavanaugh tried to tear her clothes off but was too drunk to be a real threat. Kavanaugh doesn’t remember her and he doesn’t remember this kind of party.

Kavanaugh, who clearly understands the law and how things work, hired Beth Wilkinson, a highly skilled trial attorney, to represent him in this matter. Wilkinson prosecuted Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols for their roles in the Oklahoma City bombings.

Enter Susan Collins, stage right. She proposed that Ms. Ford be asked to testify and be questioned by: Beth Wilkinson. Then her attorney could cross examine Brett Kavanaugh. Boom! This would totally avoid the fiasco of all those liberal Democratic senators giving more ludicrous speeches followed by idiotic questions. Gone is the hope of liberal Democrats painting the picture of some arrogant clueless white male Republican Senator harassing a traumatized innocent female. Instead Ms. Ford would be interviewed by one of the most dangerous female trial attorneys on this planet. That is a worst case scenario for Democrats and Ms. Ford.

A high percentage of those arrogant white male Democrats (and Republicans) serving in the Senate came from similar backgrounds to Brett Kavanaugh. Most of them came from wealth, attending private elite prep schools before moving on to places like Harvard and Yale. Odds are most if not all of them attended private parties, involving females where there was a lot of alcohol consumed. It you want to see what this looks like, watch “Animal House” again. It would be very interesting to interview girls who attended those parties.

Ironically, based on what we know, Brett Kavanaugh may actually be the exception. That is why 65 females who knew him in high school rushed to his defense. Were they all wrong about him?

Democrats are bringing up Anita Hill, as if she matters. But no one can quite remember what she does now and Clarence Thomas still sits on the Supreme Court. So who really won that encounter?

After Lincoln was shot, the show at Ford’s Theater was cancelled.  Seems about right.

TDM

The latest desperate attempt by Democrats to slow down the Kavanaugh confirmation is doomed to failure.  This is nothing more than absolute proof that Democrats will do anything, and I do mean anything, to regain political power.  It is beyond despicable.  It is also a monumental error. Judge Kavanaugh will be confirmed. If Democrats thought this was bad for them before, they have just made it much worse.

Let’s assume that Judge Kavanaugh is not like the rest of us and he is not fuming at the Democrats pulling this stunt. Let’s assume that he is that rare human being capable of setting aside his own personal feelings and still make fair decisions regarding people he despises. Let’s assume that unlike Democrats, Judge Kavanaugh will make decisions on the facts and the law, not personal feelings and emotions.

Even if all that is true, which is far from certain, Democrats have made a huge mistake. They have put on a man on the Supreme Court, in a lifetime position, who can never forget the significant of what is going on. A man who knows that Democrats do not care about the constitution or the law. That they have no interest in dealing with any issue with honesty and fairness. That they are incapable of compromising with anyone or anything that does not conform to their opinion of political correctness, even when such opinion runs directly counter to their own previously held opinions on the same subject.  They are interested in one thing and only one thing only; personal power. They will destroy anyone or anything that gets in their way.

In his many years of service as a judge, Brett Kavanaugh has dealt with many other people who share this set of values, or I should say, lack of values. We call them criminals.

Democrats may not even recognize it when it happens. It may be a case that seems so innocent. It may show up in a carefully wording phrase in a legal opinion, largely overlooked by the vast majority of people. But, at some point, Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh will make a decision that will be devastating to Democrats. Not because he is filled with bitterness and hatred, although that would be more than understandable. Not because he is seeking revenge, although that too would be explainable. No, he will make this decision because he has been confronted with the sad reality that one of our political parties is now dominated by people who do not consider themselves subject to our laws and our constitution. He will make this decision because he knows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that this country cannot survive if people like this ever regain political power. He knows that, under the current leadership, the Democrat party itself represents a clear and present danger to this country.

Any he will be on that court for the rest of his life.

TDM