The entire Russia collusion theory has collapsed. The last thin straw supporting this house built upon the sand was destroyed in the following article by the Hill:
The FBI claims that the entire Russian collusion investigation began because of a tip received by an Australian Diplomat. The timeline is beyond significant. This is documented in the following New York Times article:
“The hacking and the revelation that a member of the Trump campaign may have had inside information about it were driving factors that led the F.B.I. to open an investigation in July 2016 into Russia’s attempts to disrupt the election and whether any of President Trump’s associates conspired.”
The story is that Papadopolous was drinking heavily at an upscale bar in London in May 2016. He allegedly told Australian Alexander Downer a bizarre story about Papadopoulos meeting with an obscure Russian professor who claimed to have dirt on Hillary and that Russian had Hillary Clinton e-mails. In July 2016, after the DNC e-mail were published by WikiLeaks this brave but obscure Australian diplomat told his story to the FBI. This allegedly began the entire Russia collusion theory and investigation. Now we know that this Australian diplomat literally arranged for the Clinton Foundation, sound familiar? to receive $25 million in tax payer money from Australian to fund aids research. The FBI either did not know about the Clinton Foundation connection or they considered it to be irrelevant. Either way, they certainly failed to disclose it.
This means that the entire Russian collusion theory was founded on a house of cards directly connected with either the Hillary Clinton campaign or the Clinton Foundation. One has the increasing suspicious that the Trump campaign is only guilty of being incredibly stupid and unwittingly falling into the murky web of the Clintonian network.
In summary, the more we learn about the forensics of Russian interference in the 2016 election the more we keep finding Hillary Clinton’s fingerprints on every single piece of crucial evidence. One must ask whether at some point this will become so obvious that even the main stream media will notice the stench.