According to the following story, the NSA is very concerned about the quality of the background investigation of Snowden:<\/p>\n
http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/2013\/06\/20\/nsa-data_n_3474820.html?icid=maing-grid7%7Chtmlws-main-bb%7Cdl2%7Csec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D333404<\/a><\/p>\n It is pretty embarrassing when someone with a top secret clearance spills the beans to the Guardian UK and then runs off to Hong Kong.\u00a0 I can already guarantee you that there are far fewer holes in the background of Eric Snowden than there are with Barack Hussein Obama and we elected him President.<\/p>\n I speak from experience, because I had a top secret clearance.\u00a0 It took several months to conduct my background investigation and they checked everything.\u00a0 I even had friends from high school telling me about how someone sat down next to them in a bar and started up a conversation.\u00a0 Then at one point they were casually asked if they knew me from high school. \u00a0\u00a0They checked my background from date of birth until the day I got my clearance.\u00a0<\/p>\n They would never have considered giving a security clearance to someone who could not verify where they were born.\u00a0 I am not a birther, but Barack Obama has never produced a certified copy of his birth certificate.\u00a0 No representative from the State of Hawaii has ever said the following:\u00a0 The birth certificate presented by Barack Obama is identical to the one we have on file. <\/i><\/b>\u00a0\u00a0They have said they have his records, that they can verify he was born in Hawaii and that he is a U.S. citizen.\u00a0 All that is nice, but we still don\u2019t have a single copy certified copy of his birth certificate.\u00a0 You know the kind we all needed to get a driver\u2019s license or register to vote, before Democrats decided that was no longer necessary.\u00a0 I believe Obama was born in Hawaii and I am really sure he wasn\u2019t born in Kenya.\u00a0 But that doesn\u2019t change the fact that he has never produced this most basic of personal documents.\u00a0<\/p>\n This was discussed, again, this week on MSNBC:<\/p>\n http:\/\/tv.msnbc.com\/2013\/06\/18\/republican-congressman-questions-obamas-validity\/<\/a><\/p>\n Once again, MSNBC missed the point.\u00a0 This is a photocopy of a long form birth certificate that looks like it was photocopied out of a book.\u00a0 Does your birth certificate look like this?\u00a0 Do you know anyone else whose birth certificate looks like this?\u00a0 I mean this is not hard.\u00a0 You ask for a certified copy of your birth certificate and you get it in about two days.\u00a0 This is like driving around with a photocopy of your driver\u2019s license.\u00a0 Do you think any cop would accept that, not matter how \u201cgood\u201d it looked?\u00a0<\/p>\n They would never have considered giving a security clearance to someone with a history of drug abuse.\u00a0 That includes pot smoking.\u00a0\u00a0Barack Obama admits to using cocaine and smoking pot enthusiastically.\u00a0 This would have disqualified him for a security clearance.\u00a0 I had one guy who went all the way through language school with me.\u00a0 The Air Force had invested over 18 months in training him.\u00a0 They found out he had smoked pot one time and they immediately booted him out of the program.\u00a0 To all you kids out there who think that all the baby boomers smoked pot, I guarantee you that if they did, they didn\u2019t work for the NSA if anyone knew about it.<\/p>\n They would never have considered giving a security clearance to someone who had traveled overseas under less than clear circumstances.\u00a0 Barack Obama\u2019s great adventure to Pakistan, after leaving Occidental College, would have drawn a lot of scrutiny.\u00a0 It was probably not illegal to travel to Pakistan at that time, but it would have raised some very red flags.\u00a0<\/p>\n They would have never considered giving a security clearance to someone who had close blood relatives living overseas.\u00a0 Barack Obama has several close relatives, including a grandmother and a half-brother living in Kenya.\u00a0<\/p>\n They would never have considered giving a security clearance to someone who was close friends with someone like William Ayers.\u00a0 Ayers was a leader in the Weatherman Underground, a terrorist organization that conducted bombings against government facilities, including the pentagon.\u00a0 They don\u2019t give security clearances to people who are best friends with enemies of the state.<\/p>\n Both Barack Obama and Michelle Obama surrendered their law licenses.\u00a0 Michelle surrendered hers in 1994.\u00a0 Barack Obama surrendered his in 2007.\u00a0 There are no public records verifying the reason.\u00a0 Factcheck.org tried to discredit rumors that both Obamas surrendered their licenses to avoid discipline.\u00a0 The following article contains their report:<\/p>\n http:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2012\/06\/the-obamas-law-licenses\/<\/a><\/p>\n Actually this report only demonstrates the lengths to which factcheck.org went to try and cover for Obama.\u00a0 The exact wording is as follows:<\/p>\n Neither of the Obamas has any public record of discipline or pending proceedings against them, according to the online<\/a> public registration records of the ARDC. We also confirmed that with Grogan, who said that the Obamas were \u201cnever the subject of any public disciplinary proceedings.\u201d<\/i><\/strong><\/p>\n I am sure this is absolutely true and absolutely meaningless.\u00a0 The key word is \u201cpublic.\u201d\u00a0 There is no \u201cpublic\u201d record.\u00a0 The official policy of the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) is that if the ARDC investigates a licensed lawyer, the proceedings become public record, but the ARDC won\u2019t punish or publicize finding against a lawyer who voluntarily resigns.\u00a0 The only thing factcheck.org was able to prove was the lack of a public record.<\/p>\n Barack Obama surrendered his law license after a request was filed with the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission asking that the application to the bar that Barack Obama had filed in 1991 be examined in light of information that had recently been made public.\u00a0 Was that a coincidence?<\/p>\n You will also notice that factcheck.org uses tortured logic to try and prove that Obama didn\u2019t say what he said during a State of the Union address.\u00a0 What Obama actually said:<\/p>\n Abroad, America\u2019s greatest source of strength has always been our ideals. The same is true at home. <\/i>We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we\u2019re all created equal<\/i>; that no matter who you are or what you look like, if you abide by the law you should be protected by it; if you adhere to our common values you should be treated no different than anyone else..\u00a0 <\/i><\/strong><\/p>\n He was clearly quoting the Declaration of Independence and he was clearly referring to the Constitution.\u00a0 Actually, I don\u2019t care, because Obama didn\u2019t write the speech and the blame for this mistake rests with his speech writer and his TelePrompter.\u00a0 I only mentioned to show that factcheck.org went to great lengths to avoid actually checking facts.\u00a0 They should have said:\u00a0 \u201cObama made a mistake.\u201d\u00a0 I mean who really cares?<\/p>\n I firmly believe that at some point all of this will eventually come out and there are going to be a lot of red faces.\u00a0 But, I doubt that this will happen while Obama is still President.\u00a0 We are just now learning about JFK and he has been dead for nearly 50 years.\u00a0 We recently learned that JFK wrote in his diary,about the great job Adolph Hitler was doing in Germany.\u00a0 Nice!<\/p>\n http:\/\/dailycaller.com\/2013\/05\/24\/jfks-secret-diary-fascism-right-thing-for-germany\/<\/a><\/p>\n Of course the main stream media never reported this, because Camelot is still Camelot.<\/p>\n Snowden probably should not have been given a clearance, but he was vetted a lot more than Obama.\u00a0 Maybe, during our life time, we will learn the truth.\u00a0 Don\u2019t hold your breath.<\/p>\n TDM<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" According to the following story, the NSA is very concerned about the quality of the background investigation of Snowden: http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/2013\/06\/20\/nsa-data_n_3474820.html?icid=maing-grid7%7Chtmlws-main-bb%7Cdl2%7Csec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D333404 It is pretty embarrassing when someone with a top secret clearance spills the beans to the Guardian UK and then … Continue reading