The liberal left is going absolutely nuts over the devastating drop in poll results for Barack Obama.\u00a0 The Pew report is particularly devastating.\u00a0 By now everyone admits that \u00a0Obama had the worst performance in a Presidential debate by a large margin.\u00a0 The following article from Andrew Sullivan in the Daily Beast is fun reading for any Republican.\u00a0 If nothing else, it is vivid proof that the liberal left is incapable of handling defeat:<\/p>\n
http:\/\/andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com\/2012\/10\/did-obama-just-throw-the-entire-election-away.html<\/a><\/p>\n The liberal left believes that Mitt Romney won the debate because he told lies and Obama was too inept to challenge him.\u00a0 For example, see the following:<\/p>\n Lies work when they are unrebutted live on stage. And momentum counts at this point in the election<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/em><\/strong>Sullivan got it 100% wrong.\u00a0 What really happened is that the Obama campaign spent more than 200 million dollars lying about Mitt Romney.\u00a0\u00a0 When the real Mitt Romney walked onto that stage all those lies were exposed.<\/p>\n Prior to the debate, 42% of the voters were sure to vote for Obama and 43% were sure to vote for Obama.\u00a0 That left 15% undecided.\u00a0 But they really weren\u2019t undecided.\u00a0 They had already decided that they didn\u2019t want Obama.\u00a0 The only thing they didn\u2019t know was whether or not they wanted Mitt Romney.\u00a0 Mitt Romney didn\u2019t need to defeat Obama in that debate, he just needed to show people that he was up to the job.\u00a0 He did a lot more than that.<\/p>\n The liberal left knew that they only had one chance to save this failed President.\u00a0 They had to convince the American people of the biggest lie of all.\u00a0 They had to convince you that Mitt Romney was a fatally flawed candidate and that he was losing this election. \u00a0They had to get people to choose Obama as the lesser of two evils.\u00a0 \u00a0They knew Obama could never win this election, so they set about to make Romney lose this election.<\/strong><\/p>\n Always remember that much of the main stream media is openly rooting for Obama.\u00a0 That explains why the media response to the Libya crisis was to pretend that Romney made a major gaffe by daring to criticize Obama.\u00a0 Liberal reporters were so desperate to destroy Romney that they missed the major story playing out right under their noses.\u00a0 This is why the main stream media ran so many stories pretending that Romney\u2018s comment about the 47% was a game changer.\u00a0 Obviously, this also explains why the main stream media accepted a reported 7.8% unemployment rate that defies gravity.<\/p>\n Remember all those polls showing Obama in the lead?\u00a0 The main stream media desperately wanted you to believe them.\u00a0 They may even have deceived themselves.\u00a0 But the polls never made any sense.\u00a0 It is vital to understand what poll results really mean.\u00a0 The polling companies rarely tell you the raw data from their surveys.\u00a0 They take the raw data, plug it into a computer program and then estimate results.\u00a0 That is why you always have to look at the underlying assumptions when evaluating poll results.\u00a0 All those polls showing Obama ahead were the result of turnout projections similar to 2008.\u00a0 Yet no one considers that likely to occur.\u00a0 The raw data in the same polls showed a very different result.\u00a0 The very same polls showed Romney with a significant lead ahead among independents.\u00a0 Ask any political consultant, from either party, \u00a0if Obama can win re-election without winning the independent vote and they will say no way.<\/p>\n You don\u2019t have to take my word for any of this.\u00a0 The following link is to an article in \u201cThe Hill:\u201d<\/p>\n http:\/\/thehill.com\/blogs\/ballot-box\/polls\/261189-pollster-pulls-out-of-fla-nc-and-va-says-obama-cant-win<\/a><\/p>\n Before the debate the Suffolk poll had Obama ahead 46% to 43% in Florida.\u00a0 Look at the following quote from Suffolk University pollster David Paleologos:<\/p>\n \u00a0\u201cA poor place to be for a couple of reasons. Number one, his ballot test, his head-to-head number was below 47 percent before the debate, and it\u2019s very, very difficult when you have the known quantity, the incumbent, to claw your way up to 50. So that was a very, very poor place for him to be.<\/p>\n \u201cSo we\u2019re looking at this polling data not only in Florida but in Virginia and North Carolina and it\u2019s overwhelming,\u201d Paleologos concluded.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Let me translate:\u00a0 \u201cYou guys weren\u2019t really stupid enough to think these polls were good for Obama, were you?\u00a0 Let me explain, Obama\u2019s odds of winning Florida just went from slim and none to none minus.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n The bottom line is that we should have known better than to believe the main stream media in the first place.\u00a0 The bias has never been more obvious.\u00a0 Why would they be reporting accurately about who is winning the election when they can\u2019t report accurately on anything else?<\/p>\n TDM<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The liberal left is going absolutely nuts over the devastating drop in poll results for Barack Obama.\u00a0 The Pew report is particularly devastating.\u00a0 By now everyone admits that \u00a0Obama had the worst performance in a Presidential debate by a large … Continue reading