The following article is simply shocking:<\/p>\n
\u00a0http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/04\/19\/us\/politics\/19muslim.html?ref=us<\/a><\/p>\n The Obama administration is moaning and groaning about the homegrown threat from right-wing extremists, like the Tea Party movement.\u00a0 Bill Clinton even blamed the Oklahoma City bombing on intemperate comments by talk radio.\u00a0 Actually, Tim McVeigh was on record as saying that his actions were in response to Janet Reno sending in the military to kill all women and children in Waco.\u00a0 The Oklahoma bombing took place two years to the day after the Waco fiasco.<\/p>\n Janet Napolitano even said that former U.S military personnel should be viewed with suspicion.\u00a0 But those who actually do represent significant threats with regard to homegrown terrorism are not just given a pass, they are invited as honored guests.\u00a0 I have seen numerous reports from England showing how Muslim clerics, who seem to be moderate when speaking English, were stoking the fires of Islamic extremism when speaking in Arabic.\u00a0 For example; the men who planted the bombs on the London subway were inspired by Abu Hamza Al-Masri:\u00a0<\/p>\n http:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/stories\/2007\/01\/20\/world\/main2380485.shtml?source=RSSattr=World_2380485<\/a><\/p>\n Like the two men graciously invited to the United States by Hillary Clinton, Al Masri was once considered to be a moderate Muslim leader who had renounced violence.\u00a0 But, the problem is that to an Islamic fundamentalist, violence has a different meaning.\u00a0 Read carefully the following excerpt from the above article.\u00a0 This was written by Abu Hamza Al-Masri:<\/p>\n “The term ‘violence’ has become a media weapon against Islam and it now serves interested regimes against anyone who defends his faith, himself, and his honor in the face of [the attempt] to rule him by means of legislative and oppressive measures. From the Islamic and realistic point of view, this term [violence] is deceptive and incompatible with Islamic religious law in the struggle for the survival of Islam. The Mujahideen do not recognize this term in any way, because the clear goal of using [this term] is to eliminate the ‘precept of doing good and the prohibition on doing evil,’ at a time that the regimes have a monopoly on terrorism\u2026.”<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n The first person invited was Tarig Ramadan.\u00a0 His maternal grandfather was Hasan al-Banna, who founded the Muslim Brotherhood in 1928.\u00a0 His father, Said Ramadan, led the Muslim Brotherhood through the 1950\u2019s until he was exiled to Egypt.\u00a0 The following is the proclamation made by Hasan al-Banna in forming the Muslim Brotherhood:<\/p>\n .“Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. Qur’an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope.”<\/em>\u2014Muslim Brotherhood<\/p>\n When Ramadan speaks to a Western Audience he talks about unity and mutual respect.\u00a0 But, when asked about violence he gives answers very similar to the above quote from Abu Hamza Al-Masri.\u00a0 There are also consistent reports that when talking to Arabic speaking audiences he talks about his deep-seated hatred of the West.\u00a0 This is also consistent with Abu Hamza Al-Masri. \u00a0He has called for the extermination of Israel.\u00a0 He endorses Wahhabism, which is considered by some to be the most extreme form of Islam.\u00a0 He is alleged to have numerous connections to fundamental Islamic militants, and U.S Intelligence reports indicate that he maintains ties with al Qaeda.\u00a0 This is why the Bush administration banned him from entering the United States.\u00a0 I checked the Muslim Brotherhood website, and they are thrilled that the enlightened Obama administration had the wisdom to finally allow this great man to visit the United States.<\/p>\n The other person is Adam Habib, from South Africa.\u00a0 He also was banned by the Bush administration for the similar reasons.\u00a0 When commenting on the death of a white supremist in South Africa he said that \u201cviolence is the product of the polarized nature of our society.\u201d\u00a0 That is very similar to the things that Ramadan has been saying.\u00a0 These aren\u2019t really violent people, its\u2019 just that our way of life is so intolerable to them that they can\u2019t help themselves.\u00a0 This is also similar to the logic expressed by those who say that 9-11 was the inevitable result of U.S. foreign policy toward Muslim nations.<\/p>\n In order to understand what Islamic fundamentalists really want, we just need to listen to what they say.\u00a0 Perhaps no one explains this better than Osama Bin Laden.\u00a0 He wrote a letter explaining exactly what he wants.\u00a0 For those who want to read this letter, following is the link:<\/p>\n http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/world\/2002\/nov\/24\/theobserver<\/a><\/p>\n Let me paraphrase.\u00a0 In order to get him to tolerate us, we must do all of the following:<\/p>\n 1.\u00a0 Convert to Islam.\u00a0 Discard any religion, opinion, order, or theory that contradicts Islam.<\/p>\n 2.\u00a0\u00a0 Adopt Sharia Law.<\/p>\n 3.\u00a0 Admit that we are a nation without principles or manners.\u00a0 Admit that we demand from others things which we do not require of ourselves.\u00a0<\/p>\n 4.\u00a0 Stop supporting Israel.\u00a0 Stop supporting any government that is resisting Muslim terrorists.<\/p>\n 5.\u00a0 Withdraw from every Arab country.\u00a0<\/p>\n 6.\u00a0 Stop supporting corrupt leaders in Arab countries (corrupt means those who tolerate Western ideas, such as capitalism).\u00a0 Do not interfere with their politics or method of education.<\/p>\n 7.\u00a0 Interact with Muslim extremists on the basis of mutual interest and benefits.\u00a0 Stop supporting Jews.<\/p>\n It is hard to read this letter of demands from Osama Bin Laden without recognizing the obvious comparison to actions already taken by Barack Obama.\u00a0 The first thing Obama did as President was to travel around the world apologizing for the sins of the United States.\u00a0 (See Item 3 above)<\/p>\n If Obama is supporting Israel, he has sure fooled a lot of people.\u00a0 Even people like Barbara Boxer had to speak out with regard to the Obama administration\u2019s policy toward Israel. (See Item 4 above)<\/p>\n He appears to be working hard to withdraw our troops from every Arab country, starting with Iraq, followed shortly by Afghanistan. (See Item 5 above)<\/p>\n Obama is the first U.S. President who has failed to even address human rights issues when talking with Arab nations.\u00a0 Look at how Obama recently tried to distance himself from Karzai. (See Item 6 above)<\/p>\n Now, Obama has invited Muslim leaders, formerly considered links to international terrorism, to come to the United States to talk about our mutual interests and benefits.\u00a0<\/p>\n At best, Barack Obama thinks he can reason with the Islamic fundamentalists.\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Unfortunately, this is incredibly na\u00efve.\u00a0 Islamic fundamentalists are not interested in co-existing with non-believers.\u00a0 Obama, to a hard-core Muslim, is someone who was raised as a Muslim that later converted to Christianity.\u00a0 In their eyes, this makes him the worst of all – a Muslim apostate.\u00a0<\/p>\n Islamic fundamentalists are only interested in destroying us.\u00a0 Obama either ignores or does not understand that the first, non-negotiable tenant of Islam is the discarding of any religion, opinion, order, or theory that contradicts Islam.\u00a0 There is no room for toleration from those who view tolerance itself as evil.<\/p>\n TDM<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The following article is simply shocking: White House Quietly Courts Muslims in U.S. By ANDREA ELLIOTT Published: April 18, 2010 \u00a0http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/04\/19\/us\/politics\/19muslim.html?ref=us The Obama administration is moaning and groaning about the homegrown threat from right-wing extremists, like the Tea Party movement.\u00a0 … Continue reading