EXACTLY!

In a bombshell report on Fox News, an NBC insider, Kathy Arue said her source said this was all true.  She said the Obama administration was concerned about Trump so They were wiretapping him.  Incredibly, she was trying to explain why this was ok.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03/obama-admin-source-confirms-wiretapping-conducted-video/

On Friday, March 3, 2017 Democratic Senator Chris Coons said the following during an interview with Andrea Mitchell:

“There are transcripts that provide very helpful, very critical insight into whether or not Russian Intelligence and senior Russian political leaders, including Vladimir Putin, um, were cooperating, were colluding with the Trump campaign at the highest levels to influence our election.”,  

Today, on Fox News Sunday, Coons was singing a very different tune.

http://legalinsurrection.com/2017/03/chris-coons-walkback-i-have-no-hard-evidence-of-collusion-between-trump-world-and-russians/

He admitted that he had seen no hard evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

It is increasingly clear that in their haste to destroy Trump liberal Democrats and the main stream media have made a huge error.  So far there is zero evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia about the election.  We can be certain that if there was such evidence it would have leaked long before now.  It is clear that Democrats just want an ongoing investigation that will distract the Trump administration from implementing its policy.  But in their haste they failed to realize that it would be a serious abuse of power for the Obama administration to use the FBI and U.S. Intelligence Agencies to investigate a political opponent during a political campaign.

Even the New York Times and the Washington Post realizes this, which is why they said Trump offered no proof of these allegations.  He didn’t need to.  A New York Times article released in January confirmed that there had been surveillance of the Trump campaign.  Senator Coons said that there were transcripts.  How could there be transcripts if there were no wiretaps?

We are going to see a desperate attempt by Democrats and the main stream media to stop this story by saying President Obama denied it.  But, Obama didn’t deny that the surveillance took place, he just denied ordering it to take place.  That is, in effect, an admission that he knew about.  Every expert agrees that no one in the Obama administration would have dared ordering surveillance of Trump during the campaign without Obama knowing about this.  Obama didn’t have to order it, he should have immediately issued an order to stop it.

Today White House Sean Spicer tweeted the following:

“President Trump is requesting that as a part of their investigation into Russian activity, the congressional intelligence committee (3/4) exercise their oversight authority to determine whether executive branch. Investigative powers were abused in 2016.  Neither the White House nor the president will comment further until such oversight in conducted.”

 

If you were a member of the Obama administration who participated in this abuse of power, it is time to become afraid, very afraid.  I would suggest lawyering up and don’t risk being last in line to play let’s make a deal.

If you are a senior Democratic Senator or Congressional Representative calling for an investigation of alleged collusion between the Trump campaign you were too stupid to realize that using the FBI and Intelligence services to spy on a political opponent is a really big problem.

If you are the editor of the Washington Post and the New York Times and you have been ignoring one of the most explosive political stories in our nation’s history, while hysterically chasing rumors about a story that would not even be a crime, it is time to become very afraid.

If a President of the United States allowed the FBI and the intelligence agencies to conduct widespread surveillance on a political opponent during a presidential election that is close to the worst case example of abuse of power.  Asking Russia to hack the DNC e-mail servers would be highly unethical but it is not certain it would be a crime. In addition, even with the resources of the FBI and the intelligence community so far Democrats have ZERO evidence to support this allegation.

Now if they do come up with such evidence, the next question has to be:  How exactly did you get this?

This reminds me of an incident in Novato, California where we used to live.  Several people saw a man pull up in a pickup truck, cut the chain off a bike, throw it in the back of his truck and drive off.  Several people wrote down his license plate number and called the police.  The police showed up with a 12 year old boy and his parents.  The boy promptly identified the stolen bike. That is when the man in the pickup handed them his receipt for the bike, when he bought it new, and asked if there was any law against retrieving property that had been stolen from him.  Exactly!

TDM

One thought on “EXACTLY!

  1. Where are the Woodward & Bernsteins now? The “Grey Lady”‘s pallor is now more of a deathly grey, and the WaPo, well, fish wrap comes to mind… The public’s as much to blame in many ways, as is the Fourth Estate itself, as in the age of soundbite “news,” the masses are too lazy to think, to read beyond the headline or, God forbid, read a book for some legitimate context on issues far too complex to be discussed, or rather shouted about, in the bloviating that passes for reporting/commentary on the likes of Fox, MSNBC, et.al. People allow themselves to be spoonfed this drivel, than are “outraged” when some complete outlier or unexpected result occurs in the real world. Ted Turner’s idea of the 24 hour news cycle has finally jumped the shark, as the daily absurdity that is the “MSM” is growing exponentially. Ed Morrow is undoubtedly doing summersaults in his tomb…

Comments are closed.