ANTIDISESTABLISHMENTARISM

Antidisestablishmentarism is actually a real word. It was developed in England in the 19th century by people who were opposed to removing the Church of England as the state church of England. If you find this confusing, so did many people in the 19th century. Yet, it is a cool word and it perfectly describes this election. The MSM is desperately trying to rescue Hillary Clinton from herself. They are trying to preserve the establishment in both parties. Antidisestablishmentarism describes it perfectly.

While a rapidly shrinking number of Kool-Aid drinking liberal left wackos still believe that Hillary is secretly honorable and trustworthy, the vast majority people are sick and tired of the MSM and they aren’t buying this load of crap. MSM credibility has dropped down to about a 32% credibility level. I frankly think that is still artificially high. One of the few things certain in life is that the MSM seldom gets it right about anything.

For example the MSM would have you believe that a black cop shooting a black thug waving a gun is a racist pig because he should have waited until the thug actually pointed the gun at him before firing. That is utter nonsense and about 68% of the population realizes this. The other 32% are glued to their TVs whenever CNN is on and they think Hillary is the most wonderful person ever to run for President of the United States.

This is why this election is so different. If you watched the MSM and you listened to the pundits, Hillary won the debate in a landslide. That is because the MSM doesn’t think minor Republican witch hunts like Hillary being extremely careless with classified documents are relevant. Of course they also think Hillary lying about Benghazi and the Clinton Foundation pay for play cash cow is equally irrelevant. They have no problem believing someone would really pay $250,000 to hear someone as boring as Hillary Clinton to repeat a Teleprompter speech, written by someone else, consisting primarily of outdated liberal clichés. But the average American is simply not that stupid.

The percentage of people who believe this nonsense, while very vocal and often glorified by the MSM is dwindling daily. Most people have given up on the MSM. They don’t watch CNN, NBC, CBS, MSCNBC, CNBC, NPR, ABC or even Fox News any more. Fox News is slightly better than the others, but by a very slim margin. Even Fox News is shredding viewers. We simply get our news somewhere else.

Real people listened to what Donald Trump actually had to say and they recognized something remarkable. Donald Trump is a real person and he actually answered questions. That may not necessarily be politically correct at times, and he is a little rough around the edges, but it is honest and a whole lot of people agree with him. I even heard one so-called conservative pundit complain that Trump didn’t understand the need to just ignore the question and deliver a well-rehearsed zinger. That type of comment explains how John McCain and Mitt Romney managed to achieve the near impossible task of getting beat in a debate by Barack Obama.

Donald Trump is the “anti-antidistablishmentarium” candidate in this election. A lot of people, who easily recognize all the baggage Trump brings to the process, understand this simple reality. The MSM doesn’t have a clue. The only way to generate real change is to bring in a real person who is ready, willing and able to simply ignore the establishment. At some point, Trump is bound to disappoint, because he is just as much a part of the establishment as every else, but he at least recognizes the problem. Hillary, on the other hand, doesn’t think there is a problem.

If you believe the MSM Trump lost the debate. But not everyone pays attention to CNN. In fact a whole lot of people don’t pay attention to CNN. The DailyMail UK did an excellent job of publishing all the other polls, not just CNN. Are they ALL wrong?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3809204/Most-snap-polls-Trump-winning-debate-landslide.html

Some polls that had very large samples all showed Trump winning. TIME had over 400,000 responses and Trump won 58% to 42%. Since TIME is not exactly a Republican rag, that surprised me. CNBC had over 220,000 responses and Trump won 51% to 49%. No one would accuse CNBC of being conservative. Fortune, which had over 430,000 responses, had Trump winning 51% to 49%.

Today CNN is “plaining” why these “internet” polls are all wrong. That would be more impressive if the CNN poll was not based on pure nonsense: Following is from the CNN/ORC website:

“Interviews with 521 registered voters who watched the presidential debate conducted by telephone (landline and cell) by ORC International on September 26, 2016. The margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus 4.5 percentage points.

Survey respondents were first interviewed as part of a random national sample conducted September 23-25, 2016. In those interviews, respondents indicated they planned to watch tonight’s debate and were willing to be re-interviewed after the debate.

26% of the respondents who participated in tonight’s survey identified themselves as Republicans, 41% identified themselves as Democrats, and 33% identified themselves as Independents.”

That’s right, the CNN poll involved a whopping 521 people they were able to interview over the phone. But wait, it’s even worse than that. These are people already interviewed by CNN previously who agreed to watch the debate and get interviewed again. Every “pundit” agreed that Hillary won the debate because she was more aggressive in attacking Trump, yet these people thought that Trump attacked Hillary 56% of the time to her attacking him 33% of the time. This is a joke. Based on these demographics Hillary would have won that poll if she had thrown up on the podium.

We can expect a full court press by the MSM declaring Hillary the leader by a huge margin. They are going to try and convince everyone that a Hillary win in evitable. They need to do this to get all the Kool-Aid drinkers to vote and to trick the rest of us in to staying home. They may or not actually believe this, but they desperately want you to believe this. Incredibly some people on the left even criticized Lester Holt for being too easy on Trump. None of them get it. Trump is not just running against Hillary Clinton, he is running against MSM. Every time the MSM opens its’ blatantly biased mouth it just adds credibility to the Trump campaign. We are not necessarily sure about Trump, but we are absolutely positive about the credibility of the MSM. Hillary is fully capable of losing this election all be herself. If she continues to get this kind of support by the MSM, that loss could turn into a landslide.

TDM